[[If you want to submit that the scientific method is flawed and needs revised or replaced with something else, we can discuss that but I think it off topic for this thread. ]]
Why elsewhere? IF the info in this paper argues strongly agaisnt naturalism, then it’s highly appropriate to discuss it here- along with hte other impossibilities and far reaching probabilites suggested by TOE- ‘Accepted’ doesn’t mean ‘right’ as you well know
If GGG hasn't any complaints, then by all means, tell me what you think is wrong with the scientific method, and exactly how you want it changed or what you want it replaced with.