Replies

[[No it is what you do and it is called projection.]]

no, it is what you do- There- now that we’ve settled this ‘tit-for-tat’ let’s either move on, and step it up a bit, or as I said, I’m done- Not gettign into a long drawn out argument about issues irrelevent to the thread topic-

[[Did you know that with DNA samples you can trace your family history? In fact you can trace your own history back to a common ancestor with chimpanzees and other great apes?]]

You can’t be serious? Our genetic coeds were traced back to a mitochondrian EVE- BEYOND that there was NO direct evidnece- just projections about religious beleifs about common descent- And guess what? Mito-EVE was genetically pure- and the genetics degraded down to our present day conditions-

[[What is you evidence supporting ID?]]

I told you where to look, I told you who presented it, and I told you this thread topic provides more eivdnece supporting ID whether you accept it or not- if you don;’t- just say so- and we’ll move on. you seem bound and determined to argue moot points and to claim there is nothign supporting ID- and I’m not goign to get into a long drawn out argument with you when you can find evidneces which DO support ID- this paper one of them. If you have soemthign relevent to add to this discussion- do so- if not- just say so, and perhaps get back to you ‘mass energy’ discussion

there is scientific evidence that chemically pure systems can not arise from dirty chemicals naturally- this supports ID whether you think so or not- there is also evidence that info can not exist without metainfo inplace- Biology provides this evidnece- This supports ID whehter you think it does or not is irrelevent- There is evidnece from the fossil records that species came onto the scene suddenly, fulyl formed, and fully functional- This evidence supports ID whether you think it does or not is irrelevent- There is evidnece that IC systems can not have hteir IC parts removed without breakign down and must have been assembled in one move- this supports ID whether you think it does or not is irrelevent- The fact is that all these things and many others do indeed support ID regaRLDESS OF WHEHTER YOU ACCEPT THEM OR NOT- tHROWING A FANTASTICAL HYPOTHESIS OUT HTERE SUPPOSEDLY SHOWING SOEM (srry- cps lock) mythical evolutionary pathway for the REDUCIBLE parts does NOT invalidate the support for ID, the mythical pathway is just an assumption and a projection of a Darwinian religious belief into the equation