And why shouldnt I if hte evidence demands that we argue against it? Arguing against somethign isnt a demand or statement that hte somethign should not still be pursued if they so choose to-
Then what exactly is the point of arguing against it?
371 posted on 01/12/2009 6:15:43 PM PST by tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)