[editor-surveyor]

I thought that you’d appreciate that one, since everything about naturalism’s ‘evidence’ is exactly so contrived.

[metmom]

I thought it sounded an awful like *We’re here therefore evolution must be true.*

[LeGrande]

I thought that you’d appreciate that one, since everything about naturalism’s ‘evidence’ is exactly so contrived.

Believe it or not, I don't like the TOE. It isn't elegant. It has almost no predictive power. It is almost like the standard model, filled up with observations, that may or may not be applicable.

I happen to think that gene transfer, viruses, and epigenetics are going to be big players in the future. Penrose might be pointing in the right direction.