I’m not asking you to accept that common descent is a fact. I’m asking you accept the fact that IF common descent is a fact, it places constraints on the kinds of similarities and differences you would find in related organisms.
Living things not enginered by humans conform to these constrints. Living things engineered by humans do not conform to these constraints.
[[Living things not enginered by humans conform to these constrints. Living things engineered by humans do not conform to these constraints.]]
Engineered things conform to different constraints because hteir genetic info has been altered (but it must be pointed out it has been altered fully within the constraints of the kind
[[I’m not asking you to accept that common descent is a fact. I’m asking you accept the fact that IF common descent is a fact, it places constraints on the kinds of similarities and differences you would find in related organisms.]]
I appologize- My head is really reeling- I’m just not sure where you’re goign with htis- What about hte cosntraints? What is this supposed to intimate? Even IF CD were a reality, how does constraints that might arise show that htere couldn’t as well be common design? I’m just havinf trouble tryign to udnerstand what you’re driving at here.