[[I’m going to continue asking why single celled organism do not become non viable when their generations are thousands of time shorter than human or animal generations.]]
Persoanlly I’d rather discuss the article later- but for now, simply because of Metaifnromation which helps maintain and tries to keep cells from the end product of entropy- non viability.
[[A microbe population has as many mutation or copy error events in a year as a human population would encounter in a million years, and yet microbes do not become extinct.]]
Yep- they are incredibly robust- but even htey have their species specific limits- they can not survive IF their own particular DESIGNED parameters has been violated- and should such a case happen, the only way to prevent non viability woudl be to introduce info fro ma higher source to be able to deal with that particular scenario- however, we nkow that lateral gene transference doesn’t happen except between very few like kinds, but even this has it’s limits.
If genetic entropy is a physical law, I’m going to ask why microbes don’t go extinct, considering they undergo as many copy errors in their genomes in a thousand years as multi-celled organisms would in a million years.
A physical law is mot waived simply because a designer wishes it to go away.
Do you have some basis for asserting that an entropy principle differs in operation for one form of life to another? Is there some design manual that you have access to that the rest of us don’t?