Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cacoethes_resipisco

The other centrail issue being discussed (or avoided) is that metainfo exists, that is, information abotu information- a code of informaiton that exists to manage information already present- this code of metainformaiton. This metainformaiton is an end product- in order for informaiton in pseices to be useful in hte sense of self preservation and maintanance, it has to rely on the metainformation to do so, and either htis metainfo was spontaniously created before the ‘species’ (single cells arived on the scene) OR, it was intelligently caused to coincide with hte ifnormation within species, and htis metainfo had to be present first to be able to deal with al lthe supposedly arisign new species i nthe future. The premise of hte article is that in order for soemthign to move beyond it’s own kind, it NEEDS to take the infromation it does NOT possses from a higher source somehere- and htis is antithetical to macroevolution because mutaitons can NOT cause NEW non species pecific info to arise, it can ONLY work on the info already present within a narrow species specific parameter.

We KNOW that DNA had ot have informaiton abotu information already present in order to even survive, and that this info about info contained instructions to repair and maintain the DNA, and it has been suggested that such info about info is simply impossible for nature to create because of hte reasosn suggested i nthe articles.

This is what we are discussing- Not whether the author has an OPINION abotu who or what hte itnellgience is beinhd IC- if you want to join us in htis discussion, we welcoem yuo- if not, then you’ll be on your own and be seen as presenting claism and accusaitons irrelvelnt to the discussion


147 posted on 01/12/2009 12:16:17 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

> The premise of hte article is that in order for soemthign
> to move beyond it’s own kind, it NEEDS to take the
> infromation it does NOT possses from a higher source
> somehere-

Please define “kind”. Two of the three bones you, I and all other mammals use to hear are, complete with all their information, used by reptiles as jawbones. Are mammals and reptiles different “kinds”?


151 posted on 01/12/2009 12:20:35 PM PST by cacoethes_resipisco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson