[LeGrande]

Are you going to engage the affirmative, or are you going to confine yourself to talking about double slit experiments and black swans all day?

I have been. Your "proof" or "evidence' supporting the paper was the "Law of Cause and Effect" which the article is based on and you quoted. There is no scientific "law of cause and effect." The whole premise of ID is based on flawed Aristotelian logic. Science is not based on deductive reasoning. The article is trying to use deductive reasoning to falsify science. The black swan example points out the fallacy of deductive reasoning.

[GodGunsGuts]

Williams isn’t trying to falsify science, he is falsifying materialist evolution. And if you are ruling out deductive reasoning with respect to historical inference, you have just ruled out Darwinian evolution.