Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin_geek
If the Republicans in CA nominate a pro abortion candidate, then we might as well vote for a Democrat.

Pro-life measures will never pass in CA at this time.

The state is swimming in $40 billion red ink - and you want to make abortion a priority?

Look, a lot of people supported RINOLD in 2003 because of the fiscal aspect. The problem with RINOLD is that he unfortunately supported global warming and didn't take on the entrenched unions or fight the bloated state gov't.

The state is being killed by regulations, taxes, bureaucracy, illegals, etc. Fight the social issues for another day, and work on getting the fiscal house in order first. I had no problem with Schwarzenegger's social views initially as long as he would have reined in spending and advanced real, objective, long-term energy policies.

22 posted on 01/12/2009 7:36:44 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

If you would have bothered to read further down in my comments, I opined that anyone who was willing to compromise on the right to life is willing to compromise on anything.

Looks to me like our current governor, who is “pro-choice” has compromised when it comes to spending.

If you’re willing to vote for another RINO, be my guest. However, I’d think you’d have learned your lesson about RINO’s after the experience with our current governor.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result.


24 posted on 01/13/2009 4:56:53 AM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson