Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lucysmom

There is a difference between “required” and voluntary action. Voluntarily producing one’s birth certificate may begin a tradition, but it does not make for a requirement.
***The required action is to qualify for the elibility of the office in this case, as set forth in the constitution. Of course, a constitutionalist would know that, and defend it as proper.


926 posted on 01/16/2009 10:41:59 AM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
***The required action is to qualify for the elibility of the office in this case, as set forth in the constitution. Of course, a constitutionalist would know that, and defend it as proper.

The Constitution doesn't require a presidential candidate produce a birth certificate for public approval - read it, the requirement just isn't there. Further, I don't recall any presidential candidate ever being required to prove his citizenship (McCain volunteered his and Obama did too, just not the long version), and I'm OLD.

The Constitution does require the president to be a natural born citizen, however it doesn't not suggest nor require any action on the part of the candidate to prove his or her status.

1,005 posted on 01/16/2009 5:25:14 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 926 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson