Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeManN
If I were arguing the case, I would admit them because they show nothing but intent on the grandparents to cover up.

Why would the grandparents want to "cover up"? That question has to be answered in a way that makes sense to the "reasonable man".

886 posted on 01/16/2009 7:03:55 AM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 874 | View Replies ]


To: lucysmom; FreeManN

lucy:”Why would the grandparents want to “cover up”? That question has to be answered in a way that makes sense to the “reasonable man”.”

As I understand (and have read), there is a question about the address that was given in the newspaper announcements that does not appear to match up to any valid address for the Obama’s or the Stanley’s. This does seem to call into question the validity of the newspaper account.

I think FreeManN is making an assumption that this was not a clerical error but instead was malfeasance on the part of the Stanley family.

The question would be, why is the “incorrect” address given for the birth announcement? Was it an error on the part of the newspaper, the hospital, or was it actually submitted by the family? If it was submitted by the family, why??


887 posted on 01/16/2009 7:11:59 AM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson