Like I said, how can you refute dollar amounts without the bills...
You have evidence of Obama having the philadelphia law firm on retainer then? Read the work put into the documents?
How much would it cost to verify the authenticity of documents, which, by the way, is a speculative action...
The nonsense is not showing your birth certificate when you’re running for president if there are any doubts.
You still haven’t shown me what statutes covered the 1960’s that would definitively prove what you infer. They might be on that link, I don’t remember at this point. 338-17 or 14 or something. Doesn’t matter, just show me what was in effect at the time, and how that means he could not possibly be born out of state...
No, I’m not blind, but apparently you’re naive and deliberately skipping over the potential revisions I pointed out...
You produce the bills. The burden of proof is on those who make a claim, not on those who would challange it. You are the one, asserting without proof, that Obama is spending money defending lawsuits.
You have evidence of Obama having the philadelphia law firm on retainer then? Read the work put into the documents?
Not now, but I am certain he did at the time the brief was filed. All political campaigns have lawyers working for them on retainer. Unfortunately, it's a necessity in our litigeous society.
He has shown it, and no one important is questioning it.
You still haven’t shown me what statutes covered the 1960’s that would definitively prove what you infer.
I've shown you the only statute on Hawaii's books that allows for registration of foreign births. All statutes have their comprehensive legislative histories indicated. If that statute, or something comparable to it were on the books in 1961, then it would be indicated in the brackets. It is not.