Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato
"Because we don't trust *him*. He needs to be removed from the "chain of custody" of any documentation. Plus the Birth Certificate, that he (supposedly) has released is not sufficient anyway to prove natural born citizenship."

A birth certificate is considered legal proof of place of birth.

You don't trust him. Fine. You shouldn't. But that's why there's the added provision of the state confirming the birth certificate.

420 posted on 01/11/2009 1:07:46 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]


To: mlo
But that's why there's the added provision of the state confirming the birth certificate.

I want them to confirm the information on the BC, not just the fact of it's existence. It's completely possible to have a BC on file with the state of Hawaii, and not be a natural born citizen, so merely confirming that the state has one on file is not sufficient. If the state sent a copy of the BC to interested/concerned parties, then that would at least be sufficient to prove where he was born, who his father was (and was he a citizen or not). Those are enough to determine natural born citizenship, under any of the alternate definitions.

449 posted on 01/11/2009 3:31:00 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson