Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

“He thinks any one who thinks that the SCOTUS is going to ignore or dismiss this case is delusional”

I sure hope your father is correct once again.


32 posted on 01/09/2009 9:44:21 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: devere; Lloyd227
First he says they had to wait until now for Berg to have standing.

Second, There is no precedence for this case. Can't remember the legal term, but it mean this is original decision that all other cases will refer to in the future. It is a historical decision and they will do everything they can to get it right.....cross every T etc.

Third, The constitution does not establish who vets the candidate, part of their decision will determine that....DNC, FEC may be held responsible in the future if not now. It could destroy the “D” party if they are proved to be part of an intentional fraud. (FEC has replied no contest IIRC).

Fourth, If BO does not provide documentation they request, He will be held in contempt and they WILL obtain it.

Read the link at 28.

35 posted on 01/09/2009 10:02:28 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson