The expert did not say it was a forgery.
***The expert said it was not reliable.
Instead of arguing just to be contrary, you can prove this wrong by citing a single instance of the expert endorsing any specific allegation of forgery.
***Why would I go down any idiotic rabbit holes that you set up? Moving the goalposts. Obfuscation. Probably several other classical fallacies as well, but from your past postings it looks like you won’t catch on to the importance of avoiding fallacies.
"The expert did not say it was a forgery."
"***The expert said it was not reliable."
Yes, we got that. Does that mean "forgery", or does it mean what SHE SAID IT MEANT?
"Instead of arguing just to be contrary, you can prove this wrong by citing a single instance of the expert endorsing any specific allegation of forgery."
"***Why would I go down any idiotic rabbit holes that you set up?"
Oh, I don't know. Maybe to prove the point YOU are trying to make? In order to make sense?
"Moving the goalposts. Obfuscation. Probably several other classical fallacies as well, but from your past postings it looks like you won’t catch on to the importance of avoiding fallacies."
You write the above and talk to me about fallacies? You don't know what you are talking about. You just like to label anything you don't like a "fallacy".