[mlo]

Yes, we saw that. Now read it for comprehension. It's the introduction to the document, not the meat. In the body she explains the basis for these comments.

"the COLB presented on the internet...cannot be relied upon as genuine."

Why not? What is the reason she gives? Is it forgery?

No. The reason is that it is not the original peice of paper. Something a document examiner always requires.

"Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm."

Yes. Which ones? She does explain you know. Stop trying to mislead people by leaving the detail out.

The ones she can affirm are the ones having to do with not being able to authenticate a scanned image, and with having the certificate number blacked out. Again, neither of which has to do with forgery.

There's a simple way to prove me wrong. Post an exact quote from her document that specifically endorses any allegation of forgery. Easy right? It would be if you were telling the truth. But you aren't, you are lying.

[MHGinTN]

I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2155990/posts

Antonyms of adj genuine; genuine (vs. counterfeit)

forg·ery : invention; something forged; an act of forging ; especially, the crime of falsely and fraudulently making or altering a document