Skip to comments.
Interview, Orly Taitz: Chief Justice Roberts Calls Conference on Obama Challenge: Lightfoot v. Bowen
Fort Hard Knox ^
| January 7, 2009
| Arlen Williams
Posted on 01/09/2009 8:28:39 PM PST by devere
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 1,221-1,230 next last
To: Frantzie
You aren't the only one puzzled by this..
Lei-off: Obama snubs Dean Its the most puzzling thing Ive ever seen in my life, added a longtime Democrat and friend of Dean, echoing the exasperation and befuddlement many close to him feel about his treatment since the election. I have tried my best through [Obama advisers] Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod and David Plouffe to ask if he ever committed some crime. I dont get it. Hes been a good soldier.
261
posted on
01/10/2009 9:00:12 PM PST
by
usar91B
(Attention to detail, team.. work as a team.)
To: null and void
“No.
The last thing I want is a vice-president Hillary!...”
It would save you 2 Guinness. :)
To: REDWOOD99
Would it? I’m pretty sure you’ve won the bet.
Either way we’re both gonna need Guinness...
263
posted on
01/10/2009 9:05:37 PM PST
by
null and void
("Sure, first there's the Ooooos and Ahhhhhs, then there's the running and the screaming.")
To: Jet Jaguar
264
posted on
01/10/2009 9:07:09 PM PST
by
null and void
("Sure, first there's the Ooooos and Ahhhhhs, then there's the running and the screaming.")
To: trumandogz
Proof in writing will suffice.
Show me and prove me wrong.
That is all I ask.
To: Jet Jaguar
Good research.
Now could you find the name of the law or State Department Directive that made it illegal for Americans to enter Pakistan?
266
posted on
01/10/2009 9:09:50 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: Jet Jaguar
No non-mohhamedan is allowed in mecca or medina.
Was Pakistan blocking US non-mohhamedan or non-diplomatic visas during it’s own internal difficulties?
267
posted on
01/10/2009 9:09:51 PM PST
by
null and void
("Sure, first there's the Ooooos and Ahhhhhs, then there's the running and the screaming.")
To: null and void
I know: it’s null and void.
268
posted on
01/10/2009 9:11:40 PM PST
by
hoosiermama
(Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
To: hoosiermama
269
posted on
01/10/2009 9:12:47 PM PST
by
null and void
("Sure, first there's the Ooooos and Ahhhhhs, then there's the running and the screaming.")
To: null and void
I was referring to Trumandog's assertion that anyone from the US could travel to Pakistan in 1981 or so.
To: trumandogz
No.
It’s on you to prove or disprove it.
By law from Pakistan or from the US State State Dept.
You need to disprove it. (in writing)
To: null and void
To: BIGLOOK; Polarik
If he doesn’t peacefully step down and tries to stir up the masses, he may be facing something like treason.
273
posted on
01/10/2009 9:19:45 PM PST
by
hoosiermama
(Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
To: Jet Jaguar; trumandogz
As am I. trumandogz assumes that only the US can keep Americans out of a foreign country.
Rather jingoistic of him, doncha think?
274
posted on
01/10/2009 9:20:45 PM PST
by
null and void
("Sure, first there's the Ooooos and Ahhhhhs, then there's the running and the screaming.")
To: hoosiermama
Thanks for that post. I wish he’d join Free Republic. I’d have a ton of questions.
275
posted on
01/10/2009 9:22:30 PM PST
by
Kevmo
( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
To: trumandogz; Jet Jaguar
Now could you find the name of the law or State Department Directive that made it illegal for Americans to enter Pakistan?
There wasn't one. Travel to Pakistan was discouraged due to the turmoil in the country with the overthrow of the Muhammad Zia Haq government in 1977.
It's suspected that Haq and his general staff were murdered.
276
posted on
01/10/2009 9:25:25 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
To: devere
277
posted on
01/10/2009 9:25:33 PM PST
by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: null and void; trumandogz
To: Jet Jaguar
279
posted on
01/10/2009 9:34:26 PM PST
by
null and void
("Sure, first there's the Ooooos and Ahhhhhs, then there's the running and the screaming.")
To: jamese777
The candidates who actually received electoral votes have more standing to show damages than candidates who received no electoral votes.
***I agree, but it doesn’t matter. The candidate just has to have some standing. Apparently you nor I have any standing.
McCain-Palin were the only other candidates to receive Electoral Votes, 173 electoral votes to be exact.
***POTO
A case can only be kicked up to the Supreme Court if it has been ruled upon at a lower court level.
***And your point is?
The Supreme Court is an appeals court, the highest appeals court.
***POTO
Almost no cases originate at the Supreme Court except for disputes between state governments or between a state and the federal government.
***And your point is?
The Supreme Court favors taking cases from the US Courts of Appeals.
***And yet, they’ve jumped in on past instances when it suited them.
Phillip Berg made a tactical mistake by skipping the US Court of Appeals
***I agree. But we are pretty far afield from what we were originally talking about. What is the point of all this obfuscation?
which is most likely why his case has been denied twice already at the US Supreme Court level.
***Possibly. Perhaps you can explain why his case has been referred for conference twice. I have never heard of that before, and all the resident FR constitutional scholars generate crickets when asked how many other cases this has happened with.
The Supremes like utilizing the chain of command and the US Court of Appeals is the next highest court to the Supreme Court.
***Back to our regularly scheduled program.
280
posted on
01/10/2009 9:34:27 PM PST
by
Kevmo
( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 1,221-1,230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson