Obviously, this data did not come from James Hansen. He would figure out a way to make it look like a temperature increase.
To: Fractal Trader; Horusra; CygnusXI; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; ...
To: Fractal Trader
This can’t be true. The polar ice caps are melting.
We’re all gonna die!
4 posted on
01/09/2009 10:13:40 AM PST by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: Fractal Trader
Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get.
LAZARUS LONG
To: Fractal Trader
"James Hansen" (..... heh, heh, heh, he said Hansen,)
It's interesting that when AGW is mentioned, both Hansen's name pops up, and NASA becomes more tarred by the cult of AGW at the GISS (headed by Hansen).
MannGoreHansen is the realization of ManBearPig.
6 posted on
01/09/2009 10:17:05 AM PST by
Paladin2
(No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
To: Fractal Trader; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; ...
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
7 posted on
01/09/2009 10:17:30 AM PST by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: Fractal Trader
That means that it is official. THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING.
To: Fractal Trader
Does anyone have diverse sources of climate info? I am looking for the truth and want to examine the extremes.
9 posted on
01/09/2009 10:32:25 AM PST by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: Fractal Trader
Obviously, this data did not come from James Hansen. He would figure out a way to make it look like a temperature increase. Actually, he did (twice), but he got caught (both times).
First, he made the October 2008 numbers much higher than the actual, by copying the September 2008 readings, for Russia, into the October data.
When that little sleight of hand was detected, he corrected the Russia data, but fudged the Arctic data to compensate, and get about the same global average.
After the second attempt was detected, it seems he gave up trying to manipulate the data (for now).
10 posted on
01/09/2009 11:31:17 AM PST by
3niner
To: Fractal Trader
I apologize for jumping too quickly. This article is just about the U.S., and I jumped to global mode, without reading carefully.
Hansen has been caught manipulating U.S. data a few times, and has changed his MO to fudging data in places where he thinks people are less likely to be paying attention.
11 posted on
01/09/2009 11:39:32 AM PST by
3niner
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
14 posted on
01/09/2009 12:21:34 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(First 2009 Profile update Tuesday, January 6, 2009___________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Fractal Trader
The temp is always near average. Thats exactly the reason why this global warming crapola is just that. The deviation in temp is so tiny over the scale of 4 billion years of earths existance that any attempt to make a projection on a global climate change is asinine.
About like interviewing 1 person in China about their favorite ice cream flavor, then trying to predict taste trends for all of Asia, Africa and Europe. The sample size is just too small to draw a reasonable conclusion.
15 posted on
01/09/2009 12:54:49 PM PST by
SoCalTransplant
(Not my President. Not now. Not ever.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson