Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

Still that’s a raw numbers chart not percentage of population. Someone upthread suggested it would look different if presented as a percentage.


26 posted on 01/09/2009 11:20:22 AM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
"Still that’s a raw numbers chart not percentage of population. Someone upthread suggested it would look different if presented as a percentage."

Well sure it does, there were 2.8 million jobs lost in 1945 when the US population was about 140 million.

This year 2.6 million jobs lost, population about 300 million.

So as a percentage of total population (not work force) 2% of the population lost jobs in 1945 --- .9% of the population lost jobs in 2008.

28 posted on 01/09/2009 11:42:01 AM PST by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson