Old debunked crap? I’ve searched and can’t find any retraction by Fox or Cameron...help me out if I’ve missed it. There was the Eisenstadt false claim of responsibility as the source which was debunked, but the “veracity of the report is not in question” - FoxNews http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov12/0,4670,PalinHoax,00.html
I hope it was a lie by someone with an agenda but I will keep digging because I want to be right...even if the truth is not what I want to hear.
I’ve also been searching for any accusations of Cameron being a liberal and all I can find are accusations of him being pro-Bush and showing conservative bias.
Carl Cameron is not a conservative, he is a smarmy opportunist “moderate” (whatever this is) ala Joe Scarborough (who was a Republican congressman). They are spineless cowards who bash real conservatives to placate liberals. They hate and fear Palin, and having been supportive of Bush is not a conservative litmus test.
Regardless of whatever political stance, Cameron’s claim that Palin doesn’t know what Africa is, is invalid. Cameron claims to have it from a McCain staffer (which they denied). Why can’t CAMERON come forward and name his source? The use of unsubstantiated, sourceless claims will get redmarked in any college paper. But I guess as long as it’s against Palin, everything goes. It’s not McCain staffers that are the cowards... they rallied to Palin’s defense. Cameron is the coward. Either disclose your “source” (which could be anyone, even from the Democrats) or shut up. Cameron did not come forward, so we can call BS on him.
If you are not satisfied with it, and prefer to believe unsourced anonymous claims and Cameron’s invalid reporting, it’s maybe because you want to believe it.
Some links:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129072/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2128623/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2128405/posts
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/08/politico-mccain-staffers-starting-to-rally-to-palins-defense/