Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush Tried to Rein In Fan and Fred
The Wall Street Journal ^ | 1-8-09 | KARL ROVE

Posted on 01/08/2009 11:44:40 AM PST by GOP_Lady

Democrats and the media have the housing story wrong.

Mythmaking is in full swing as the Bush administration prepares to leave town. Among the more prominent is the assertion that the housing meltdown resulted from unbridled capitalism under a president opposed to all regulation.

It took Fannie and Freddie over three decades to acquire $2 trillion in mortgages and mortgage-backed securities. Together, they held $2.1 trillion in 2000. By 2005, the two GSEs held $4 trillion, up 92% in just five years. By 2008, they'd grown another 24%, to nearly $5 trillion. They held almost half of all American mortgages.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; bush; crashof08; creditcrisis; fannie; freddie; housingbubble; rove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: GOP_Lady
A very informative article by Karl Rove.

I like Karl, and I wanted to think GWB knew what he was doing, but, sorry, no sale. He did his best on non-Latin border security matters, but economically, he was a rich kid spending other peoples' money. He was compassionate, I'm just conservative and still paying the bill.

He may have raised an alarm in 2001 about the GSEs, but forgot about it thereafter. He started by spending tens of billions of dollars in Africa, and never looked back. How many years passed before he vetoed a bill for excessive spending?

21 posted on 01/08/2009 12:11:14 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri

Exactamundo.


22 posted on 01/08/2009 12:11:42 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

He tried. He failed. The point?


23 posted on 01/08/2009 12:14:11 PM PST by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

I can’t even begin to count how many times I’ve heard the President explain this during press conferences, interviews, SotU addresses, etc.

Oh, wait...


24 posted on 01/08/2009 12:25:25 PM PST by Doohickey (The more cynical you become, the better off you'll be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
But how can this be? Barney Fwank told us it was the waskell Wepublicans in charge that wouldn't let us Wegulate to fix Fannie/Freddie.

It's a crime that most of the MSM have allowed Dodd and Frank to escape blame for the meltdown.

25 posted on 01/08/2009 12:30:53 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit
I really wish the Bush administration had fought harder to get the truth out.

I really wish the Bush administration, the GOP, and the McCain campaign, had fought harder to get the truth out. (Fixed)

26 posted on 01/08/2009 12:34:10 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

And where were any of the conservative pundits on this? Or anyone from the conservative movement?


27 posted on 01/08/2009 12:41:03 PM PST by TheBigIf (Supre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

Conservative pundits tried. I recall hearing the following talk about the real causes of the Fannie/Freddie financial meltdown: Rush, Hannity, Beck, Coulter, Rove, and Fox news in general. Problem was only about 10% of the population understood the real causes of the financial meltdown and too many uninformed people blamed Bush and Republicans resulting in a disaster on Nov 4.


28 posted on 01/08/2009 12:46:02 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

I meant where were they *before* the meltdown came warning us?


29 posted on 01/08/2009 12:47:46 PM PST by TheBigIf (Supre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

My sense is that Bush had a choice:

Either lose the war in Iraq

or

lose control of the financial system.

When Bush went to Congress to seek authorization to fund the surge, the democrats deal was for him to have hands off their GSEs Fannie and Freddie.

Bush folded on Fannie and Freddie and took the $$$ for the surge.


30 posted on 01/08/2009 12:50:46 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Karlos Rove trying to white-wash El Presidente Jeorge's 8 years of failing miserably.

Vaya con Shamnesty...

31 posted on 01/08/2009 1:04:46 PM PST by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

It sounds like Karl Rove is trying to save his own arse.


32 posted on 01/08/2009 1:07:51 PM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

I think by the time Bush went to congress for support for the surge it was too late to save Fannie/Freddie.


33 posted on 01/08/2009 1:13:07 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

It is hard to believe some of the idiotic responses in this thread by Bush bashers. The facts are there for all to see in regards to the efforts made by the President in trying to reign in this problem and yet there are obviously some who just want to ignore these facts and let the same mistakes be made again by the democrats and their ideology of running political agendas through the market.


34 posted on 01/08/2009 1:13:40 PM PST by TheBigIf (Supre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

“Karlos Rove trying to white-wash El Presidente Jeorge’s 8 years of failing miserably.”

Certainly you may very well be right. But I personally get the gut feeling he is really making excuses for himself...Karl Rove. After all, as I see it, dumb Bush was listening to dumb Rove’s bad advice.

But then, it is all speculation on my part...which is fun.


35 posted on 01/08/2009 1:15:27 PM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

Good point.


36 posted on 01/08/2009 1:15:50 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Bush Called For Reform of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac 17 Times in 2008 Alone... Dems Ignored Warnings

Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President’s repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.

** 2001

April: The Administration’s FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is “a potential problem,” because “financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity.”

** 2002

May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)

** 2003

January: Freddie Mac announces it has to restate financial results for the previous three years.

February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that “although investors perceive an implicit Federal guarantee of [GSE] obligations,” “the government has provided no explicit legal backing for them.” As a consequence, unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market. (”Systemic Risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Role of OFHEO,” OFHEO Report, 2/4/03)

September: Fannie Mae discloses SEC investigation and acknowledges OFHEO’s review found earnings manipulations.

September: Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact “legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises” and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.

October: Fannie Mae discloses $1.2 billion accounting error.

November: Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any “legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk.” To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have “broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards” and “receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE.” (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03)

** 2004

February: The President’s FY05 Budget again highlights the risk posed by the explosive growth of the GSEs and their low levels of required capital, and called for creation of a new, world-class regulator: “The Administration has determined that the safety and soundness regulators of the housing GSEs lack sufficient power and stature to meet their responsibilities, and therefore…should be replaced with a new strengthened regulator.” (2005 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 83)

February: CEA Chairman Mankiw cautions Congress to “not take [the financial market’s] strength for granted.” Again, the call from the Administration was to reduce this risk by “ensuring that the housing GSEs are overseen by an effective regulator.” (N. Gregory Mankiw, Op-Ed, “Keeping Fannie And Freddie’s House In Order,” Financial Times, 2/24/04)

June: Deputy Secretary of Treasury Samuel Bodman spotlights the risk posed by the GSEs and called for reform, saying “We do not have a world-class system of supervision of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), even though the importance of the housing financial system that the GSEs serve demands the best in supervision to ensure the long-term vitality of that system. Therefore, the Administration has called for a new, first class, regulatory supervisor for the three housing GSEs: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banking System.” (Samuel Bodman, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Testimony, 6/16/04)

** 2005

April: Treasury Secretary John Snow repeats his call for GSE reform, saying “Events that have transpired since I testified before this Committee in 2003 reinforce concerns over the systemic risks posed by the GSEs and further highlight the need for real GSE reform to ensure that our housing finance system remains a strong and vibrant source of funding for expanding homeownership opportunities in America… Half-measures will only exacerbate the risks to our financial system.” (Secretary John W. Snow, “Testimony Before The U.S. House Financial Services Committee,” 4/13/05)

** 2007

July: Two Bear Stearns hedge funds invested in mortgage securities collapse.

August: President Bush emphatically calls on Congress to pass a reform package for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying “first things first when it comes to those two institutions. Congress needs to get them reformed, get them streamlined, get them focused, and then I will consider other options.” (President George W. Bush, Press Conference, The White House, 8/9/07)

September: RealtyTrac announces foreclosure filings up 243,000 in August – up 115 percent from the year before.

September: Single-family existing home sales decreases 7.5 percent from the previous month – the lowest level in nine years. Median sale price of existing homes fell six percent from the year before.

December: President Bush again warns Congress of the need to pass legislation reforming GSEs, saying “These institutions provide liquidity in the mortgage market that benefits millions of homeowners, and it is vital they operate safely and operate soundly. So I’ve called on Congress to pass legislation that strengthens independent regulation of the GSEs – and ensures they focus on their important housing mission. The GSE reform bill passed by the House earlier this year is a good start. But the Senate has not acted. And the United States Senate needs to pass this legislation soon.” (President George W. Bush, Discusses Housing, The White House, 12/6/07)

** 2008

January: Bank of America announces it will buy Countrywide.

January: Citigroup announces mortgage portfolio lost $18.1 billion in value.

February: Assistant Secretary David Nason reiterates the urgency of reforms, says “A new regulatory structure for the housing GSEs is essential if these entities are to continue to perform their public mission successfully.” (David Nason, Testimony On Reforming GSE Regulation, Senate Committee On Banking, Housing And Urban Affairs, 2/7/08)

March: Bear Stearns announces it will sell itself to JPMorgan Chase.

March: President Bush calls on Congress to take action and “move forward with reforms on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They need to continue to modernize the FHA, as well as allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to homeowners to refinance their mortgages.” (President George W. Bush, Remarks To The Economic Club Of New York, New York, NY, 3/14/08)

April: President Bush urges Congress to pass the much needed legislation and “modernize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [There are] constructive things Congress can do that will encourage the housing market to correct quickly by … helping people stay in their homes.” (President George W. Bush, Meeting With Cabinet, the White House, 4/14/08)

May: President Bush issues several pleas to Congress to pass legislation reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the situation deteriorates further.

“Americans are concerned about making their mortgage payments and keeping their homes. Yet Congress has failed to pass legislation I have repeatedly requested to modernize the Federal Housing Administration that will help more families stay in their homes, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance sub-prime loans.” (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/3/08)

“[T]he government ought to be helping creditworthy people stay in their homes. And one way we can do that – and Congress is making progress on this – is the reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That reform will come with a strong, independent regulator.” (President George W. Bush, Meeting With The Secretary Of The Treasury, the White House, 5/19/08)

“Congress needs to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans.” (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/31/08)

June: As foreclosure rates continued to rise in the first quarter, the President once again asks Congress to take the necessary measures to address this challenge, saying “we need to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” (President George W. Bush, Remarks At Swearing In Ceremony For Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development, Washington, D.C., 6/6/08)

July: Congress heeds the President’s call for action and passes reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as it becomes clear that the institutions are failing.
In 2005— Senator John McCain partnered with three other Senate Republicans to reform the government’s involvement in lending.
Democrats blocked this reform, too.

More... Not only did democrats not act on these warnings but Barack Obama put one of the major Sub-Prime Slime players on his campaign as finance chairperson.

UPDATE: The media is not reporting that the failed financial institutions are big Obama donors.

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/09/bush-called-for-reform-of-fannie-mae.html


37 posted on 01/08/2009 1:18:07 PM PST by roses of sharon ("No socialist system can be established without a political police.", Churchill -1945)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

Think about it. At the time Housing was good, the economy was good.

Why upset the status quo?

Bottomline is that Rove is not owning up to the failure. President Bush allowed spending to spiral out of control.


38 posted on 01/08/2009 1:20:12 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

“Bottomline is that Rove is not owning up to the failure. President Bush allowed spending to spiral out of control.”

Amen.


39 posted on 01/08/2009 1:24:48 PM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
I agree that Bush spent too much but that did not cause the collapse of the financial markets. The democrats own the causes for that:

Carter initiated the CRA program.
Clinton/Rubin loosened the standards at Fannie/Freddie that created the subprime market.
Democrats blocked all of the numerous attempts by Republicans to reign in (yes regulate) the growing Fannie/Freddie problem.

40 posted on 01/08/2009 1:27:30 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson