Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gail Lightfoot, et al V. Debra Bowen, CA SOS (Distributed for SCOTUS Conference, Obama Suit)
US Supreme Court ^ | January 7, 2009

Posted on 01/07/2009 12:55:22 PM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: LucyT

Thanks, LucyT for the great updates.

Save the ConstitutionPing.


41 posted on 01/07/2009 7:13:05 PM PST by Iowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Thanks so much!


42 posted on 01/07/2009 7:21:52 PM PST by MamaLucci (Merry Fitzmas Illinois!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BP2

I think Leo was just totally disgusted. He worked really hard on his cases and research. I think he was stunned and thought SCOTUS was bought and paid for. We will know soon. I still have faith in Scalia and Thomas and hope for Alito and Roberts. Leo and Cort are good guys.


43 posted on 01/08/2009 12:08:09 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All

It would seem there are no individual heros among the courts - State or Federal - willing to have a hearing if only to placate the public’s accusations.

They seek only to serve their terms with as little interference of important hearings as possible.

It is as if we are now without any true legal forums nor participants willing to act within them.

The first stage of anarchy.


44 posted on 01/08/2009 1:16:59 PM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Quoting 21, Lurking Libertarian: It is totally unthinkable that the Supreme Court would stop Obama from taking office without requesting that he file oposing papers and without requesting that the Bush DOJ state its position. So my prediction, speaking as an appellate lawyer, is that, like all the previous motions for a stay, this one will be denied without comment by a vote of 0-9, and that the petitions for certiorari will also be denied without comment and without dissent.

******

21. Lurking Libertarian, appellate lawyer:

In your opinion, how did Obama prove that he is eligible under the laws of the Constitution of the United States to be President of the United States, if he won't let state and federal authorities see his long form Hawaii birth certificate---the one with the doctor and hospital names on it? Thanks.

45 posted on 01/08/2009 1:21:30 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
In your opinion, how did Obama prove that he is eligible under the laws of the Constitution of the United States to be President of the United States, if he won't let state and federal authorities see his long form Hawaii birth certificate---the one with the doctor and hospital names on it? Thanks.

Which authorities asked him for the long form birth certificate? The voters, the electoral college, and Congress (when they officially counted the electoral votes today) all seemed to be satisfied with the short form certifiate of live birth. The courts have dismissed every lawsuit that has been filed challenging Obama s qualifications, without subpoenaing any evidence. If no one else is raising any questions, I doubt the Supreme Court will see any significant issue here.

46 posted on 01/08/2009 1:36:25 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Quoting Lurking Libertarian:

Which authorities asked him for the long form birth certificate? The voters, the electoral college, and Congress (when they officially counted the electoral votes today) all seemed to be satisfied with the short form certifiate of live birth. The courts have dismissed every lawsuit that has been filed challenging Obama s qualifications, without subpoenaing any evidence. If no one else is raising any questions, I doubt the Supreme Court will see any significant issue here.

*******

Mirse here: Just wondering: When did Congress ever see Obama's short form birth certificate, from Hawaii or anywhere else?

That is, I don't recall seeing or hearing any Senator or Congressman say that he held Obama's birth certificate in his hand. Thanks.

47 posted on 01/08/2009 2:45:21 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
So many of these suits have come and gone and unless a member of the house and the senate voices objections when he is confirmed, I am afraid this is going no-where in the SC

None did.

48 posted on 01/08/2009 2:56:46 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

If no one has asked him for it, he hasn’t refused to provide it.


49 posted on 01/08/2009 3:00:10 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

This is going to dog Obama until he comes clean with the American people. I and many others will make sure that it does. He is hiding something and it must be pretty big or else he would release all of the records that he is hiding and he would cease paying legends of lawyers to hide his past.


50 posted on 01/08/2009 3:48:22 PM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Quoting 49 Lurking Liberarian:

To: john mirse

If no one has asked him for it, he hasn’t refused to provide it.

******

This is mirse. I'm sorry, but I don't understand your statement above. Could you please explain further? Thanks.

1. As I recall, you said in an earlier statement that Congress was satisfied with Obama's short form birth certificate.

2. Again, I ask you this question: When and where did any Congressman or Senator hold Obama's short form Hawaii in his own hands so that they could examine it first hand?

3. As far as I know, not a single Congressman or Senator has come out publicly and said that he has seen,touched, and examined first hand Obama's valid, short form Hawaii birth certificate and that he is satisfied with what he saw on the birth certificate.

Do you know something that the rest of us don't know?

4. You're a lawyer. Do you take a client's word that he has a document back home somewhere when he visits your office, or do you tell him that you would rather see the document first hand for yourself?

5. You say above that no one has asked Obama for his long form Hawaii birth certificate---the one with the doctor and name on it? Maybe I'm missing something here, but it seems that people all over the world have bombarded Obama with demands that Obama release his Hawaii long form birth certifcate---the one with the doctor and hospital names on it, but Obama has refused to do so.

6. If Obama was born in Hawaii, do you have proof that he was even born in a certain Hawaii hospital?

7. For instance, it seems the Obama family itself is confused as to the name of the Hawaii hospital Obama was born, and no Hawaii hospital, for some unknown reason, has come out publicly and verified that Obama was born there.

8. You say nobody asked for Obama's Hawaii long form birth certificate, and that is why Obama has not provided it?

9. I would think that Obama would VOLUNTARILY provide such a document in order to prove once and for all that he is eligible to be president under the laws of the Constitution of the United States.

51 posted on 01/08/2009 4:18:39 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
Mirse here: Just wondering: When did Congress ever see Obama's short form birth certificate, from Hawaii or anywhere else? That is, I don't recall seeing or hearing any Senator or Congressman say that he held Obama's birth certificate in his hand. Thanks.

No one has. But they were all-- every one of them, without exception-- satisfied with whatever evidence of citizenship Obama has provided. They are the ones who have the legal responsibility to decide his eligibility.

52 posted on 01/08/2009 4:26:53 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
5. You say above that no one has asked Obama for his long form Hawaii birth certificate---the one with the doctor and name on it? Maybe I'm missing something here, but it seems that people all over the world have bombarded Obama with demands that Obama release his Hawaii long form birth certifcate---the one with the doctor and hospital names on it, but Obama has refused to do so.

"People all over the world" ask a lot of things. They have no official power to "demand" anything. The people who count in deciding if someone is qualified to be President are first, the voters; second, the members of the electoral college; and third, the members of the House and Senate sitting in joint session. All of them have approved Obama.

no Hawaii hospital, for some unknown reason, has come out publicly and verified that Obama was born there.

The "some unknown reason" is that they would go jail for violating HIPAA if they disclosed patient information.

8. You say nobody asked for Obama's Hawaii long form birth certificate, and that is why Obama has not provided it?

What I said is that no one with any official standing has "demanded" it, and therefore he has not "refused" to produce it.

53 posted on 01/08/2009 4:34:00 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: unspun

I sure hope Taitz knows what she is talking about. I can only pray.


54 posted on 01/08/2009 6:21:24 PM PST by nbhunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
The "some unknown reason" is that they would go jail for violating HIPAA if they disclosed patient information.

*******

1. Stanley Dunham Obama, Obama's mother, is dead. Does HIPAA say that a Hawaii hospital cannot reveal that she was ever a patient at the hospital in 1961, even if she died in the 1990's and today is 2009?

As I understand HIPAA, once Obama's mother died, then a hospital can legally verify that she was or was not a patient at the hospital in 1961.

2. As I understand HIPAA, if Obama tells his Hawaii birth hospital that it can tell the world that he was born there, then Obama's birth hospital can legally do so.

3. But for some unknown reason, Obama has refused to allow his Hawaii birth hospital---if there is one---to tell the world that he was born there. I find that very strange on Obama's part.

55 posted on 01/09/2009 7:31:18 AM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson