Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just A Nobody

In a court of law the onus is on the one making the claim. This whole circus is the equivalant of suggesting he should prove himself innocent. The law doesn’t work that way. Why do you think ALL of the cases have been labeled as frivilous? It is because they are.


38 posted on 01/07/2009 3:09:34 PM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: DE88

To put it in a more basic terms here. Let’s say I suspect that my co-worker is an illegal immigrant. So I go sue my employer and him both to get them prove his legal status because they are violating immigration law, or take it to a prosecutor(of course I would have no standing, same as in these cases, and neither would the prosecutor). That is a backwards case. They are under no obligation to prove my allegation false. Once I have definitive evidence of his illegal status then I can have a case.

All of this right now is so far beyond silliness it is embarrassing.


42 posted on 01/07/2009 3:16:34 PM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: DE88
ALL of the cases have been labeled as frivilous

Really? I was not aware that any of them had been labeled frivilous. Please site a source for that claim.

Cases are being heard.

44 posted on 01/07/2009 3:22:16 PM PST by Just A Nobody (I *LOVE* my Attitude Problem - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: DE88; Just A Nobody
This whole circus is the equivalant of suggesting he should prove himself innocent.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Prove himself innocent???? No one is accusing him of a CRIME! NO ONE!

There is NOTHING criminal or not criminal about the case.

We have a GAME here with a rule book which is commonly known as the Constitution. Where's the umpire? No one in any branch of government wants to step up, be the man in striped suit, who will wave his arms, and say, “YOU'RE OUT!!!” or “HOME RUN! !”

Every other president has presented evidence that they are natural born citizens. ARMIES and ARMIES of witnesses could have stepped forward and testified that the only place the president could have been born was their home town.

But...Obama hasn't done that and there is no umpire to force him to do it. It has NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING to do with innocence or guilt!!!

Now it could be, that if Obama is not a natural born citizen he would guilty of defrauding millions from innocent people....but that's simple! All he would need to do it withdraw from the GAME!

I bet the red states soon enact firm laws about proving citizenship ( and any other surrounding issues) before a name is placed on the ballot.

Obama will get through this time, but NOT in the next election! I predict that he will have a health problem and needs more time with his family.

49 posted on 01/07/2009 5:55:19 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: DE88

Then, the courts should take the time to force him to provide equal access to evidence (just as is required in any case) so that we can prove his is ineligible to be president. Your “since you don’t have a dead body, you don’t have a crime” argument has been proven wrong on many occasions.

Obama is hoping this will go away and he can ignore it and that is why we have all these trolls in here trying to espouse such actions. These are not the droids you are looking for; move along, move along!


113 posted on 01/08/2009 1:50:09 PM PST by ExTxMarine (For whatsoe'ver their sufferings were before; that change they covet makes them suffer more. -Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson