Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nominal

I have been looking at this via google. It seems to me the Supremes may have taken the case only to get rid of similar cases...if they were going to grant an injunction, they would have done so long before now. Also, why January 9th-after Congress opens the electoral votes? Another point, I read on Orley Taitz blog that the divorce decree does not indicate Obama was born in Kenya...but has some sort of ‘recollection by an un-named person. Never trust ‘Ed’. Wasn’t he involved in the Whitey tape? It seems to me that Berg is raking in the cash (donations) while pursuing this matter. I will look at your links now.


33 posted on 01/05/2009 7:12:30 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: bronxboy

That date is one day after Congress deals with the electoral votes. If Congress does the right thing and disqualifies Obama, the cases might no longer have merit or be withdrawn. Standing, after the 8th, probably also changes, because only at that point does Obama become president-elect (unlike what he and the press have been implying).

I have my doubts about Ed’s reliability as well, but if he can somehow get some documentation from a port of entry, that would be interesting to see, whatever it shows. It’s not a big deal as of yet. I think they were talking about a FOIA request? I don’t think that will work. But that will probably drag out for a while, so we have to wait and see...

Berg is losing money and his law firm is suffering as a result of him being involved in this, so far as I can see. Maybe we should donate a few bucks.


35 posted on 01/05/2009 7:27:34 AM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson