Replies

To: Red Badger; decimon; RC2

This is not so new - Brown’s Gas is generated and introduced into the engine as monoatomic H & O, producing much more energy than H2 & O2. In this case it is used with gasoline and really does improve fuel mileage. A lot of these devices are available today, and they work, though I have not seen any that improve fuel economy by 65% - about half that or less.

Systems have been made and installed that will run the car on Brown’s Gas without using gasoline. These require a source of electricity to convert the water to H & O. It is still efficient. There have been a few vehicles powered this way that required no fuel to produce the electricity. A lot of you reading that will yell for the tinfoil hats - so be it. I am an engineer, I have seen lab scale versions of fuelless energy generation, and I believe it.

Tesla knew how to power vehicles without fuel, and did so. There are those who do not want this to be, and will do what they can to stop it. We do not need to be dependent on petroleum for energy generation. We do not need a grid for energy distribution to our homes. I have seen a 40 KW generator that runs without fuel.

39 posted on 01/02/2009 2:01:19 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

Why didn't the Soviets build these devices? Why don't the ChiComs?

54 posted on 01/02/2009 2:18:53 PM PST by decimon

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

I have seen a 40 KW generator that runs without fuel.

That sounds like John Galt's Static Electricity Generator. Tesla was also on to this atmospheric energy phenomenon.

58 posted on 01/02/2009 2:24:10 PM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

"I have seen a 40 KW generator that runs without fuel."

Listen, I've got this land deal that I just know you'd love. Guaranteed 200% return on you investment! Give me a call at 1-555-SCR-EWME. Ask for Mr. Madoff.

I've seen a horsefly, I've even seen a housefly, but I ain't never seen me a 40KW self-sustaining generator"

To paraphrase a bit.

71 posted on 01/02/2009 2:57:03 PM PST by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

"I am an engineer.

Oh really, what railroad do you work for?

73 posted on 01/02/2009 2:58:58 PM PST by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

I have seen lab scale versions of fuelless energy generation

I am an engineer as well, an electrical engineer specialized in power systems.

You claim is one of the funniest posted here in a long time.

74 posted on 01/02/2009 2:59:54 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

Engineers can be fooled, smart ones are the easiest to fool because they think they are smart enough that they can't be fooled.

The 40 KW generator does work and the energy to do that work comes from somewhere even if you don't see it, from gas produced by electricity produced by a power plant burning fuel with loses all the way.

Exactly what vehicles did Tesla power without fuel?

81 posted on 01/02/2009 3:29:42 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794