Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain; kms61; thefrankbaum; Mark was here; YdontUleaveLibs; Tijeras_Slim; thackney; cups; ...

More information than we had before. I think it is very relevant that he actually broke the window on the door, rather than just pounding on it.


13 posted on 01/01/2009 1:16:53 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

The broken window demonstrates clearly his intent to enter the dwelling. It will be interesting to see if the homeowner is indicted, and if so, convicted.

Thanks for the update.


15 posted on 01/01/2009 1:18:33 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Thanks for the update. This does make it more difficult. Still not 100% sure where I stand on it though.


18 posted on 01/01/2009 1:23:22 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I think it is very relevant that he actually broke the window on the door, rather than just pounding on it.


That meets my “broken glass” test.


55 posted on 01/01/2009 3:11:03 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Guns don't kill people. Criminals and the governments that create them kill people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

“I think it is very relevant that he actually broke the window on the door, rather than just pounding on it.”

Changes everything. The minute it goes from pounding to breaking a shot through the door is justified.


108 posted on 01/02/2009 9:59:35 AM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson