The constitution [God rest its soul] requires presidents to be "natural born citizen". Arnold, for example, is not such. He is naturalized and hence cannot serve as president. It is the "naturalized" vs "natural" part of Obama that is in question.
Again, nobody questions whether he is a citizen. That is a bogus argument put forth by those who a) don't know the difference and/or b) want to distract from the real question.
I know the question could have been worded better. But this is an AOL writer so he did the best he could...
“Nobody questions whether he is a citizen”
Actually, I do...There is a possibility that his school records express that he is a foreigner. Thus the records are hidden. Then there is the Indonesia/US dual citizenship debate. I do not trust a thing about the man. I will not assume that he is a citizen. However, I also respect your point that he is not constitutionally qualified. Good news is that according to this AOL survey, perhaps there are not as many brain dead as we feared Nov.4th.