Seems odd to me that the court concluded that because he "only" kissed the girl that he was more likely to be sleepwalking.
Child molesters don't often jump right in and rape a kid, there is a lot of "grooming" behavior that goes on.
I think they were evaluating whether he was intending a forcible rape of any female with a pulse, rather than whether he was a child-molester in the intentional sense.
I suppose it’s not p.c. in Britain to observe that someone’s a habitual drunk who engages in inappropriate behavior while barely conscious.