Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stoat; nmh

Although I’m not conversant with the details of British law, in the U.S., “sexual assault,” as opposed to “sexual battery,” “rape,” or other charges, need not even involved physical contact. It’s a criminal charge that can be the equivalent of “sexual harassment,” the civil cause of action.

We often see the word “assault” and think it means hitting, shooting, or other physical harm, but that’s often not the meaning in law.


17 posted on 12/31/2008 9:17:57 AM PST by Tax-chick (You exist, okay? YOU EXIST! Now stop talking to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick; Stoat; nmh
We often see the word “assault” and think it means hitting, shooting, or other physical harm, but that’s often not the meaning in law.

The way it was taught to us in Oregon & California, was that 'assault' occurs when there is a credible or actual attempt to inflict bodily harm: i.e, throwing a punch or kick whether or not it connects.

Battery, OTOH, is actual touching, as in the punch, slap, kick, etc actually makes physical contact with another...whether that was the intended target or not.

One can assault one person; fail to connect, and also be guilty of battery by accidentally hitting a third party.

Example: A swings at B; B ducks, and C, standing nearby is struck A. Assault upon B; battery upon C.

43 posted on 12/31/2008 4:08:37 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (The mob got President Barabbas; America got shafted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson