Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Kenyan birth evidence to be revealed today, online
Renew America ^ | 12-31-08 | Arlen Williams

Posted on 12/31/2008 6:25:00 AM PST by mlizzy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-458 next last
To: BP2
I’m beginning to sense, more and more, that documents are being hidden via court order or some other manipulation.

It does seem odd that the divorce papers from her 2nd marriage were easily obtained but there is always this big blank space around time spans in his early years. I would venture to guess if someone were to find his college records, law records, medical, birth certificate(real one) passports, he would not be sworn in as president. I would almost stake my life on that one.

401 posted on 01/01/2009 10:33:02 PM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: BonRad

I really need to proofread.

It should say:

“If anyone hated 0bama more than I do they would spontaneously burst into flame.”

I don’t really hate *him*, as a soul, I just hate everything he believes, stands for, thinks, says, does and who he is influenced by and hangs out with.


402 posted on 01/01/2009 10:33:03 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thank you LucyT for the pings.


403 posted on 01/01/2009 10:40:02 PM PST by Katarina (Democrats hate our Constitution, America and our Military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: jarofants
Well then Barry is at odds with US policy regarding nationality status. The United States does not recognize dual citizenship.

Further, it does recognize lineage or progenitor of a foreign national who is under the jurisdiction of his country of origin.

In other words Barry was conceived and born as the child of a man whose loyalty and citizenship was of Kenya a British colony. Barry was therefore, at minimum, A citizen of Great Britain. However, he was adopted at the age of seven to a man of Indonesian citizenship and live for a time in Indonesia, even going to school as an Indonesian citizen. This is documented on his school records.

So while we have read your statement many times and we might take it at face value, What then is Barry's status as an Indonesian citizen.

Did Barry's citizenship of Indonesia also somehow expire upon emancipation?

How did he become nationalized as a US Citizen? When?

Barry found his Birth Certificate among his mother's belongings why did he not post that as confirmation of his identity?

Further, as a citizen of Indonesia he presumably had a passport. May we see a copy of all passports he held as an Indonesian and where he traveled under said passports?

Thank you in advance for your anticipated silence

404 posted on 01/01/2009 10:41:49 PM PST by Vendome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
I just recently had to pull some deeds from a local county court house going back to the 1940s, and liens from the 1950s. I could see the documents on microfiche in a special viewing room — they were literally stored in the basement of the court house, in some climate-controlled room.

The microfiche rolls and bound books were delivered to the attendant behind the desk via a dumb waiter system. I could get copies of what I saw on the microfiche viewer and books, but it would take about an hour to wait to print an UNcertified copy because of the queue in front of me.

But to get Certified copies, there was at least a 12-hour queue in front of me. I could either come back the next day to pick it up in person — a pain in the butt with court house parking, going through security, etc. Or, I could have the documents delivered and get them at my office, in one more day, via US Mail.

In this era, where we are accustom to everything being Digitized, we forget that some information is still stored in antiquated forms of non-digitized media and old, dusty books ...

405 posted on 01/01/2009 10:45:47 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Yeah, you know, I get a little suspicious about Bible quoters when they are so factually wrong, misunderstand the intent and context or are just plain intellectually bogus.

It is like saying money is the root of all evil when it isn’t. Money is an important means of functioning in all societies and when you are without money, the funny thing is how important it becomes for basic necessities.

So God would not make an incoherent statement like “the love of money is evil” when he exhorts to work a full day or we should not eat. Our work is a means of production and we are paid coin for our labor so we might purchase a needed something or other.

God does say the love of money is evil and having no other gods before him is the instruction. You love God but not other things. Those things you love on this earth are temporary while God and his love are permanent rocks we can place our faith in.


406 posted on 01/01/2009 11:08:48 PM PST by Vendome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Obama’s handlers agree with you, that’s why they have buried every thing from his adult life they could get ahold of or bribe into oblivion. Obama is a wicked man. He has no moral code that a good person would recognize. Makes him the perfect demcorat since he’s also dark skinned and more than willing to demand special treatment as an affirmative action candidate.


407 posted on 01/01/2009 11:15:12 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: jellybean

I’ve been wondering how much of his time there is really in Hawaii to be on telephone standby for close-door Court hearings about records requests, between his attorneys present vs attorneys associated with Berg, Pidgeon, Dr Orly, and other cases.

Does he have to be in the State so he can physically appear at the the Court House if the Judge demands to see him in person? Don’t know for sure. But I have my suspicions.


408 posted on 01/01/2009 11:42:10 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: BP2; BonRad; STARWISE; LucyT; MHGinTN; Frantzie; CaribouCrossing; DouglasKC; Cicero; texasmama; ...
BP2! Thank you for this post, flyboy.

I heartily suggest clicking in to BP2's post.

BP2, I intend to re-post your entire post early this morning in Investigating Obama. I'm considering this free/fair use stuff. But, if you want me to stop or after posting, edit or explicate, please FReepmail me or email me at arlenwilliams / at / yahoo / dot / com -- or comment in the post's comment field. Glad you did this.

Arlen

409 posted on 01/02/2009 12:44:30 AM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
>>> Well then Barry is at odds with US policy regarding nationality status. The United States does not recognize dual citizenship.

Well, this is where things get a bit blurry...

Dual citizenship WAS allowed up in the US until 1990. Some court cases, court interpretation, and Administration policies affected the State Department's stance on the matter to what we have currently. Remember, the State Dept is an Executive function. The next president could change it from the prior.

The official current position of the USA with respect to the dual citizenship was presented in telegrams to American consulates and embassies in “67 Interpreter Releases 799” (23 July 1990) and “67 Interpreter Releases 1092” (1 October 1990). The closest I've come across on this is on a Russian website, “Babelfished” here:

http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-res&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usa.polpred.ru%2Ftom2%2F44.htm&lp=ru_en&btnTrUrl=Translate

Now, I'm not certain how this affects Obama and his travels and citizenship before this date, particularly with his travel and stay in Indonesia. I personally think he had Indonesian citizenship, and never disclosed his American citizenship to Indonesian customs. Additionally if his name was changed in Indonesdia to Barry Soeroto, and not changed back in Hawaii around in the 1980 Divorce Decree -- that too could have some very serious implications for the president-elect.

You have the issue of “once a British citizen, always a British citizen.” British Common Law and correct legislative programs may force the issue if it comes up using his name and how it appears in the divorce decree. If you look at Sections 87-98 (http://kenya.rcbowen.com/constitution/chap6.html) of the current Kenyan Constitution, there's some unanswered question regarding Obama.:

- Is Obama still a Kenyan citizen NOW, regardless of what he's said he hasn't renounced?
- Is he a dual citizen still in the eyes of Kenya?
- Is he a Commonwealth Citizen?
- Because Parliament has the authority to change citizenship law, is there legislation or policy that is allowed as an Act of Parliament?

The Framers were going to demand an oath of abjuration for citizen and president alike, fore-swearing allegiance to other countries. I'd like to see that on Jan 20th, if we get that far along....

BTW, here's a good read US Dual Citizenship: http://www.scribd.com/doc/9670594/FAQ-on-Dual-Citizenship-1995

410 posted on 01/02/2009 4:04:12 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

placemark


411 posted on 01/02/2009 4:48:00 AM PST by tiredoflaundry (Sometimes, I guess there's just not enough bags of popcorn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Jim

10CC of BS? NEVER!!!!!...........They were great!..........

412 posted on 01/02/2009 5:38:25 AM PST by Red Badger (I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Gemsbok; Star Traveler
Star Traveler is having a good time “lol-ing” all over this site.

It makes me sick. I don't mind their opinions as much as I mind the flippant, disrespectful attitude shown to other FReepers who follow these threads.

I am so sick and tired of Star Traveler “LOL-ing” all over my Constitution. I and many others made too much of a sacrifice for a Obama lover to come along and laugh at our seriousness of this issue.

He/she is on every BC thread repeating the same mantra and adding LOL to the end of non-funny statements.
So either they are retarded or just ignorant. No one here is being swayed by the endless commentary and the LOL doesn't make the tripe easier to swallow.

In my opinion, star traveler can take the lol and stick it where the sun don't shine.

413 posted on 01/02/2009 5:54:05 AM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales

Please just glaze right by Star Traveler’s postings, don’t bother reading the retread tripe—they are designed to do exactly what you describe, don’t give him the power.


414 posted on 01/02/2009 6:10:52 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Bump from yesterday’s ping. Thanks.


415 posted on 01/02/2009 6:24:21 AM PST by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales

Look at it this way, them being here keeps them away from our children at the playgrounds.

So what if FR has some cockroaches running around, ever seen one with its head cut off? I hear it takes 10 days for it to die.

Might be the same here you know.


416 posted on 01/02/2009 6:30:12 AM PST by Eye of Unk (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! SA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: jarofants
Uhhh sorry but factcheck .org owned by the annenbergs and is not a good source, IMHO.

We have been covering this for months now and have uncovered reams of evidence both real and circumstantial about this guy and who He really is.NO one knows. If this is the best you have, won't work for me.

417 posted on 01/02/2009 6:46:11 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: nominal

You asked — “What do you mean when you say the rules change?”

You can do things legally (at least, theoretically, if not in “practice” so far) with Obama before he is in office. Once he is in office, then separation of powers (between the branches of government) are relevant (he being in one of those branches).

If he were to be removed, Congress is the one that has been assigned the power to remove him through the Impeachment and Trial process (per the Constitution). The Supreme Court cannot do anything to remove him from office (the Constitution doesn’t give the power to them and has specifically given it to Congress) — and if asked to, they would defer to Congress to do its duty.

But, we know how well that worked with Clinton...


418 posted on 01/02/2009 6:50:56 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales

You said — “Star Traveler is having a good time “lol-ing” all over this site.
It makes me sick. I don’t mind their opinions as much as I mind the flippant, disrespectful attitude shown to other FReepers who follow these threads.”

Well, when I see the same kinds of things going on as with Chief Editor Korir and what he finally let everyone know was his massive hoax and how he intended to “punish the fools” — it does get very humorous to see those kinds of wild ideas being floated that bear no resemblance to reality.

Now..., one solid connection to reality was a thread that was posted, just a day ago, about an Oklahoma legislator putting forth a bill to require vetting for a Presidential candidate on their state level. Now, that was the type of “common sense” that I’ve been talking about — and was going to talk to the representatives in Oklahoma when they get into session. However, there are other smart legislators here, already “on the case”...

It’s the difference between recognizing “reality” and doing something that actually works, versus all the strange stuff that keeps showing up on these posts (one for example that some Sheriff/Marshall is going to walk into the President’s office and escort him off the premises — LOL.. (that’s deserving of a triple LOL...)...

It’s hard to get funnier than that...


419 posted on 01/02/2009 7:11:40 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Thanks for the update.


420 posted on 01/02/2009 7:15:47 AM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-458 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson