[DallasMike]

Can you back up the counter assumption, that is wildly nonuniform absorption and wildly oscillating decay rates?

Of course not. You just get accused of believing "atheist science" and "worshipping at the Temple of Darwin."

The YEC "scientists" never have to show data supporting their crackpot theories. They just have to dupe the gullible.

[Coyoteman]

Of course not. You just get accused of believing "atheist science" and "worshipping at the Temple of Darwin."

The YEC "scientists" never have to show data supporting their crackpot theories. They just have to dupe the gullible.

I'm still waiting for the evidence to support those "what if" stories.

Is AnswersinGenesis down or something? That's where they usually go for their supporting "evidence."

One of my favorites is calibrating the radiocarbon dating method with reference to the global flood! That's about as scientific as basing egg production studies on the Easter Bunny!