It’s unfortunate that Prager, twice divorced and (I believe) currently without a wife, wrote this article, this way.
He should have focused on the couple, first, then the husband, and then, possibly, the wife. I’m not sure that 2 articles on the wifely duty will do much good the next time he advocates for traditional, rather than same sex, marriage.
“Its unfortunate that Prager, twice divorced and (I believe) currently without a wife,”
CURRENTLY WITHOUT A WIFE you say???
Really? Isn’t THAT interesting?
So, that would be TWO WIVES Mr. Prager has gone through?
Isn’t THAT interesting?
I agree. The way he equates a woman's obligation to "put out" to a job, and making moral equivalence to the man's employment, just isn't convincing, objectively speaking. As an editor, I would have told him to find a better metaphor.