For the luvofPete, stay on-point. Because the headline implicates him by association. I pointed this out from the beginning, and people kept needling me about "well what DO you call it?" -- and I kept responding, "no, you're missing the point. can't you see what the media's doing with this?"...and I guess you don't...
It's a non-freaking issue, is the point, that the media is using as another excuse to cast aspersions upon every last vestige of the Bush presidency.
Huh? I didn't see it that way. I saw the BRATS asking Bush to do something. After reading the story I don't see where Bush is implicated at all.
If the headline had read "Bush to seize land..." then you would've had a point. Or, even "Bush may seize land...". But, not the way it's written.
Like I said, some people see BDS even when it's not there.