Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: what's up

Bush signed a few bills that gave money to Planned Parenthood and WHO, so that they could perform abortions. If he was pro-life, he would have vetoed those bills, especially since they violate the 10th Amendment. Although he reduced that funding, $1 is too much.

The prescription drug law that Bush signed in 2003 was the largest entitlement law since 1965. It isn’t conservative, so he should have vetoed it.


24 posted on 12/29/2008 7:05:07 AM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: PhilCollins
The prescription drug law that Bush signed in 2003 was the largest entitlement law since 1965

Like I said, if it closed the door on Canadian drugs it was the far lesser of 2 evils. Canadian drugs would have decimated the entire US drug industry. Perfection's nice, but not possible in this life.

You can also be an ideologue on abortion if you want. But the many, many babies' lives saves through the many measures Bush took is a major accomplishment in the climate in which he took office. The reduction of abortion and the non-apologetic way Bush spoke out again and again promoting a culture of life deserves respect and, in fact, did get respect from major pro-life organizations.

25 posted on 12/29/2008 2:58:30 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson