Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dbz77

So it’s not the fault with the DNA per-se, but the lab that screwed up by contamination from another sample.


2 posted on 12/26/2008 9:31:56 AM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MyTwoCopperCoins

DNA has to be read and interpreted in the proper context.


4 posted on 12/26/2008 9:33:29 AM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
"So it’s not the fault with the DNA per-se, but the lab that screwed up by contamination from another sample."

Or the cops, or prosecutors, or whomever collected, handled, or stored the samples from the victim.

The lab is the least-likely culprit.

6 posted on 12/26/2008 9:50:16 AM PST by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Exactly. The Times has just discovered that scientific testing has to be done properly. Whoa, major scoop!

I love these stories where a reporter has just discovered something known to practically everyone else but him and assumes that because he never heard of it before, it must be news.


8 posted on 12/26/2008 10:17:04 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson