Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana Men File Lawsuit To Challenge Obama's Eligibility
WRTV Indianapolis / The Associated Press ^ | December 25, 2008

Posted on 12/25/2008 7:28:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I found it interesting that Obama took the time to describe ingreat detail his BC in one of his books. Sort of preemptive.

Well, God bless these new patriots of liberty. I hope in the generations to come their names are part of our history as the two who withstood the tide of evil.


41 posted on 12/25/2008 8:16:17 PM PST by stockpirate (My Beeber is on full stun as the site appears to be over run with trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

Supposedly Leona never said that. It was an invention of the mind of a recalcitrant servant.


42 posted on 12/25/2008 8:36:47 PM PST by Theodore R. (GWB is neither "compassionate nor conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

No, they’ll just be remembered as naysayers on the road to the socialist paradise the people of IN are awaiting.


43 posted on 12/25/2008 8:37:35 PM PST by Theodore R. (GWB is neither "compassionate nor conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

These cases seem to be continuously be sprouting up. It’s great. The more cases, the better. If it goes on for a while, something will have to break.

Newspapers, get a clue. You want readers, break a big story. This might be one.


44 posted on 12/25/2008 8:39:08 PM PST by CriticalJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Biden. See 25th amendment


45 posted on 12/25/2008 8:39:57 PM PST by Theodore R. (GWB is neither "compassionate nor conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Yeah, once he’s sworn in, all the court cases go away, because a court can’t do anything to Obama after that...

The president is above the law?

Interesting take on American democracy.

46 posted on 12/25/2008 8:43:44 PM PST by null and void (Petroglyphs. The original cliffs notes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.; metmom

You said — “Biden. See 25th amendment”

That can’t happen from any court action after Obama is sworn in, as it’s only the Congress that can impeach and convict a President after he’s sworn in. And I don’t expect the overwhelming Democrat Congress to do that, any more than it convicted Clinton...

And there is not enough time between now and the time for swearing in Obama, for a court to do a thing, in that case listed above.


47 posted on 12/25/2008 8:46:18 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

That was the whole point of putting out the forged document. It was not intended to fool anybody who actually looked at it. It was intended to provide journalists with something to REFER to in stories as a “birth certificate.”


48 posted on 12/25/2008 8:47:18 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This woman has a very good case if she could find a laywer willing to work for free. http://publish.indymedia.org/en/2008/12/918253.shtml

Hawaii Revised Statutes
HRS 0338-0020 0005.htm
(a) The department of health SHALL establish a HAWAII CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH for a person BORN IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY and child by adoptive parent or parents.

Hawaii Revised Statutes
HRS 0578-0014.htm
(b) If a NEW BIRTH CERTIFICATE... is issued, the
ORIGINAL birth certificate SHALL be SEALED.

Well, Obama’s BC WAS sealed.

Not only that but Hawaii cant just willy nilly be giving out new BC’s to foreign people and sealing the original.


49 posted on 12/25/2008 8:48:53 PM PST by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ

You said — “If it goes on for a while, something will have to break.”

Here’s the thing with that — and these court cases. There are only a very few more days that a court can say anything. And the length of time that these cases take just for *one step* along the process — is longer than the time to Obama’s swearing in.

And once Obama is sworn in, then any court case is “moot” and it won’t rule on any issue like this, because it *then* become an issue that *only* Congress can take up. And I don’t expect an overwhelming Democrat Congress to do a thing, any more than what came out of Clinton’s mess...

All court cases are *dead* after Obama is sworn in — in terms of “removing Obama” from office.


50 posted on 12/25/2008 8:49:24 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
What "next election."

Anybody who intends to raise gasoline to $8/gallon has no intention of facing another election.

51 posted on 12/25/2008 8:49:27 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

You said — “Anybody who intends to raise gasoline to $8/gallon has no intention of facing another election.”

Still, it’s a good measure to prevent this kind of thing from happening again, no matter who is running for election. It has become very obvious to many people on this Free Republic board that we have found *no way* to *actually* enforce this “qualifications” issue. Therefore, this situation should be corrected by that state law in several states, that I mentioned above.


52 posted on 12/25/2008 8:53:34 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: metmom

20th Amendment:

Section 3.
If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.


53 posted on 12/25/2008 9:13:04 PM PST by panaxanax ("Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those that don't." T.Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Don’t think you’ve seen this one article. BTW, my list is up to 15. Not every one posts continuously on the BC threads. There are more I should add.


54 posted on 12/25/2008 9:18:35 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

There are even those that are Republicans think this has all been settled.


55 posted on 12/25/2008 9:20:59 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Well, since one of his close advisers is ex CIA higher up, and had a look at his passport files illegally, I’d say a well made forgery is about to be sprung upon the courts. That is likely the reason he has stonewalled for so long, getting the best forgery money can buy and getting it into the vault in Hawaii. The Internet forgery could not be used to stand before a court so the new forgery must be so close to perfect that it will pass scrutiny. And many of the sheeple will exhale a sigh of relief even if they suspect the forgery. You know there are nine black robed oligarchs who will be relieved if he presents a really good forgery!


56 posted on 12/25/2008 9:28:43 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

*sigh* Yes. Damn you.


57 posted on 12/25/2008 9:35:10 PM PST by null and void (Petroglyphs. The original cliffs notes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Froggie; roving

Froggie and all- listen to the plainsradio broadcast http://www.plainsradio.com/monday.html
archived ( I believe under Lion’s Den-2, sorry not a regular PC here) from 12/22 Monday where OK state rep Mike Ritze says there is traction in OK legislature with certain members mulling protest. Herein he also states US Senator Jim Inhofe may be sympathetic. There is apparently a GA US House rep willing to step forward. I am not sure at all about the claim of one US senator and One US House rep being sufficient. for blockage (perhaps sufficient for hearing) per other threads here.

Roving- that is quite a fine offering by the ericson party. That exactly addresses the glaring insanity of the Hawaii BC problem.
Hope she finds her lawyer, or better yet, other parties run with this. Checked out her youtube vid though, and she is one abrasive libertarian, to be polite.


58 posted on 12/25/2008 9:38:16 PM PST by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roving; Congressman Billybob
JOhn, does this look credible to you? I might be able to find the funds to pursue it ... It does indeed appear to be a new way to approach the HI COLB and sealed documents:

LEGAL ARGUMENT #3

The State of Hawaii has exceeded its authority by making its own Rule of Naturalization with its Un-Constitutional Birth Certificate Laws which create Naturalization by SEALING the birth certificate of a FOREIGN born person and issuing the foreign born person a NEW birth certificate fraudulently stating they were born in Hawaii.

LEGAL ARGUMENT #4

The Constitution of the United States is a CONTRACT between government and we, the people; and Hawaii has impaired the obligation of contracts by exceeding its authority and making its own rules of naturalization.

59 posted on 12/25/2008 9:38:40 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Seems I might have read somewhere that even if a forgery of the vault BC is created, it would also be on microfiche with other ones in the same sequence? Or something like that?

Seems as though it would be really hard to do, without messing with a whole bunch of other birth certs.

I’m just trying to to be depressed about it.


60 posted on 12/25/2008 9:40:52 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson