When liberal hypocrisy and hubris get this blatant, Coleman simply can't acquiesce to broad-daylight larceny.
Unbelieveable!
In both cases the intended votes are clearly and resoundingly identifiable, there’s just no question whatsoever about what the voter intended. None. Not even a sliver of doubt is possible.
So why did Coleman NOT get those votes!?!?!
There is no rational or even remotely plausible excuse for this kind of in-your-face cheating.
I’m guessing the Rats believe this will end up being voted by the Senate, so who cares.
But it should end up in the Supreme Court as a completely invalid election with the results manipulated by corrupt Rat officials.
Be proud Wisconsin!
As I post regularly - and have yet to have an answer given (cause we know the answer):
Why is it that EVERY time a race comes to a recount (or multiple recounts), the DEMOCRAT candidate ALWAYS picks up more votes - and usually enough to change the outcome?
Election after election - recounts result in gained Democrat candidate votes - period.
And to see some of the votes counted for Franken, yet similarly mis-marked ballots for Coleman are thrown out...
This really should go a lot farther than just Coleman going to court - the Republican Party should thrown in every penny they have left (if any) to getting this thing handled correctly.
Reminds me so much of the thousands of 2000 POTUS ballots in Florida that were counted just because they had one corner of a chad lose, or had a slight “dimple” that was later shown to ONLY be possible when punching multiple ballots at the same time (hmmmm).
How about we count the ballots that are marked consistently with the instructions CLEARLY printed on the ballots... I firmly believe that if you too incompetent vote correctly, you are too incompetent to vote. And lack of reading skills is not an excuse - most every bubble-in ballot I have ever seen has examples to show how it is suppose to look. No reading skills necessary, other than to read the name of the candidate you want to vote for.
I don’t really care who a person wants to cast their vote for - that is their right. But if you can’t follow directions - then your vote should not count.
This is pretty obvious. This is clearly contestable. I would like to see those who called the coleman ones a no vote explain the difference. Frankly, I would have given all those to the candidate who was filled in.
We either have outright fraud or else embarrassingly obvious bias going on here.