Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc

>>My husband used to think the way that you do, but the FLDS child bride rapes made him rethink the issue.

I should be really clear that I am talking strictly of sex, not the violence. That is a completely different matter. If violence is involved, for me it is no longer rape (between a married couple) but it is assault and/or battery. I am just separating the egg white, yolk and shell. The raw sexual part of “rape” cannot be a part of “rape” between the partners of a marriage. Both granted permission on the altar.

Don’t get me wrong. I would NEVER force myself on my wife. But then, that is easy for me to say since I would never have to. It is, frankly, repugnant to me.


292 posted on 12/23/2008 3:58:59 PM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in the 1930's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy

The repugnance is wise. Trust it.


335 posted on 12/23/2008 8:38:32 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson