Posted on 12/22/2008 9:07:00 PM PST by Schnucki
Sounds like fun, but they have to bring the price WAY down.
Looks like the photographer needed a gyroscope for his camera - or he needs to lay off the Dutch beer.
It looks like fun. It’s pathetic, though, that something that small and that accelerates like a bored tortoise gets only 40 mpg. I drove a car in England that seated four and their luggage (to be sure, it was tight) and got better mileage than that.
In Sunday’s newspaper, I wrote about the Carver One, which looks like something from the future. But General Motors came up with a tilting three-wheeler about 25 years ago.
In 1982, G.M. introducted a skinny and streamlined concept car, aptly named The Lean Machine.
Preston Bruning, former chief designer of advanced vehicle concepts at G.M., was one of the lead designers of the vehicle. “It was originally an engineering staff proposal,” he said in a recent telephone interview.
The idea was first proposed by Frank Winchell, then head of Chevrolet’s research and development department. And the vehicle was to be developed as “a different way of approaching high-mileage solutions,” said Mr. Bruning, who is now retired.
As the concept evolved, Mr. Bruning spearheaded a variety of designs, including a military version (equipped with a fake machine gun) and even an airborne model. The latter version — pardon the pun — never got off the ground.
It might be hard to imagine G.M. — criticized for investing so heavily in gas-guzzling S.U.V.’s — creating a tilting vehicle built to squeeze every drop out of a gallon of gas. But when the Lean Machine made its first public appearance – at the World of Motion exhibit at Epcot in Florida – memories of oil embargoes and gas lines remained fresh in the public’s mind.
Mr. Bruning explained that the Lean Machine was capable of high mileage, which is an understatement. One prototype equipped with a 38-horsepower, 2-cylinder engine (taken from a snowmobile) averaged 100 to 150 miles a gallon. Yet, like the Carver One, the Lean Machine’s biggest party trick was its tilting mechanism.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Like, down by 90%.
I love the idea of a tiny little one- or two-seater, no meaningful cargo space, a Tata or a Smart. Plug-in hybrid or all-electric. I don't need a lot of comfort features.
But with those limitations, it won't be capable enough to be my only vehicle, and if I have to keep two, one of 'em is gonna have to be cheap. Get me an econobox for under $10K, and you'll seriously pique my interest. Under $5K, and I'll get on the waiting list.
Oh, and I’d need a gimballed cup-holder, like the ones for boats. Cheap car or not, I can’t do the morning commute without caffeine.
I am in 100% agreement except the hybrid or all-electric.
I don't like the battery issue of the hybrids, or the issue of heat in winter. (We don't really "need" A/C here in Seattle and my current car doesn't have it.) Plug-is another issue, even though we have at present relatively cheap electricity and my commute is short enough that electric would work.
Get it down to the $5-8k range and this would become my primary commute/local-business vehicle (the nearest commercial businesses are some 5 miles away).
Tiltvernugen?
Volkstiltvernugen?
Volksfarvertiltvernugen?
Tilt-a-whirl!
I’m particular to Mark’s
JUICY MUSIC
http://juicymusicaudio.com/
Class A Triode Linestage Preamp
Peach
Sorry, Workin on the analog stuff
see # 18
Messerschmidt!
Yup, we are just recreating the wheel here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
