Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

rwneill wrote on 12/22/2008 07:21:59 PM:

“States can not file bankruptcy.

True. And they can’t print money either.

That’s why, when a State becomes insolvent, the Courts would order that a Federal Receiver takeover administering the reorganization of that State by allowing the People of the State time to form a new, stable, solvent State government to govern the people of that State.

Federal troops could be involved, Federal money (the Feds CAN print money), whatever it takes to provide time for the reorganization.

This is the best plan for California under the current circumstances, IMHO.”


3 posted on 12/22/2008 4:29:36 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sinanju
That’s why, when a State becomes insolvent, the Courts would order that a Federal Receiver takeover administering the reorganization of that State by allowing the People of the State time to form a new, stable, solvent State government to govern the people of that State.

That's of very dubious constitutionality as well.

A state cannot be sued, except as it permits itself to be. When a state no longer has credit, what happens is it then only can pay for what is has money for.

What happens then is that reality is imposed on the state, and the state government officials have to come down from their LSD trip. Phrases like "legally mandated expenditures" no longer have meaning. The entity issuing the checks must suddenly decide who gets paid, and who does not, and bear personal responsibility for the decision.

12 posted on 12/22/2008 5:24:46 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson