Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasCajun
I have suspected since day one that this whole thing was a Democratic plan to affect the election and Republicans in general. It was no doubt it was dreamed up by the same people who brought us the Valerie Plame affair. Not to mention all the problems this administration has had with the State Department, CIA and others seeming to willfully scuttle its plans.

I think we would be appalled if we could somehow wave a magic wand and reveal all the shenanigans this administration has fallen prey to.

Truthfully, I consider it a miracle George Bush has accomplished as much as he has in the face of the constant attempts to discredit him and sink his plans.

The sad part is that you have to wonder how much he could have accomplished if he had gotten even the cooperation that Democratic presidents have gotten from Republicans over the years. Sure, the Republicans have fought the president tooth and nail, but there's never been the outright attempts to destroy a president and his administration regardless of how badly it damaged the country.

14 posted on 12/22/2008 6:20:12 PM PST by jwparkerjr (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jwparkerjr

Regarding IncyMac - Schumer’s comments hastened the inevitable. The bank was going to fail, regulators had it on a watch list and were monitoring it, anticipating a need to intervene. What might have been a month or two glide path to takeover became a precipitous decline after Schumer’s public remarks - and that short-circuited what would have been a more orderly takeover or transfer of the bank operations. Some might say - it would have failed anyway, what’s the difference? The difference is enormous - and the dollar amount difference between doing it the way Schumer did it and the way it would have happened in the absence of Schumer’s remarks is very large. The losses to the FDIC and to employees of the bank were significantly larger as a result.


15 posted on 12/22/2008 7:58:59 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jwparkerjr

Repeating successful tactics: John Pierpont Morgan again used rumor and innuendo to create a panic that would change the course of history. The panic of 1907 was triggered by rumors that two major banks were about to become insolvent. Later evidence pointed to the House of Morgan as the source of the rumors. The public, believing the rumors, proceeded to make them come true by staging a run on the banks. The public thus became convinced that the country needed a central banking system to stop future panics, overcoming strong congressional opposition to any bill allowing the nation’s money to be issued by a private central bank controlled by Wall Street; and the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913.


16 posted on 12/22/2008 8:42:48 PM PST by SisterK (Watch em Gabe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jwparkerjr

“The sad part is that you have to wonder how much he could have accomplished if he had gotten even the cooperation that Democratic presidents have gotten from Republicans over the years. Sure, the Republicans have fought the president tooth and nail, but there’s never been the outright attempts to destroy a president and his administration regardless of how badly it damaged the country.”

That is an excellent summary of what the rats have done our country in their non stop attempts to destroy him and his people.


22 posted on 12/23/2008 3:52:26 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals or foriegn or domestic terrorists or both?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson