Skip to comments.
Thatcher Wouldn't Have Gone Wobbly on Detroit
Wall Street Journal ^
| 12/20/2008
| Andrew B. Wilson
Posted on 12/20/2008 3:57:26 PM PST by SMCC1
"Keynsianism is proof you shouldn't 'leave economics to economists..."
(Excerpt) Read more at sbk.online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: carindustry; detroit; thatcher
1
posted on
12/20/2008 3:57:26 PM PST
by
SMCC1
To: SMCC1
To: SMCC1
Yes, I read the article and agree with it. But I disagree with this phrase,
"Keynsianism is proof you shouldn't leave economics to economists..." Keynesianism is proof you shouldn't leave economics to people who put short-term political benefit ahead of long-term fiscal responsibility. Keynesianism is the triumph of the political world over the economic world. It cannibalizes the second derivative to feed the first.
3
posted on
12/20/2008 4:07:45 PM PST
by
M203M4
(Bill Kristol: Piltdown conservative)
To: M203M4
So true....and I love your tagline too.
To: SMCC1
Wall Street Journal has alot of nerve...after Wall Street itself was majorly bailed out, no questions asked.
5
posted on
12/20/2008 4:23:21 PM PST
by
madison10
To: madison10
The Wall Street Journal was less than 100 percent supportive of that bailout.
6
posted on
12/20/2008 5:13:08 PM PST
by
Arguendo
To: SMCC1
And Reagan would’ve fired them!
7
posted on
12/20/2008 5:35:55 PM PST
by
al_c
(Avoid the consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity)
To: M203M4; TigerLikesRooster; rabscuttle385
Keynesianism is proof you shouldn't leave economics to people who put short-term political benefit ahead of long-term fiscal responsibility. Keynesianism is the triumph of the political world over the economic world. It cannibalizes the second derivative to feed the first.Well said. When Keynes was asked what would happen in the long run if his schemes were continually implemented, he flippantly replied, "In the long run, we're all dead." Not surprising, coming from a childless homosexual. Today Keynes is dead, but we are not, and now we shall have to pay the accumulated bill.
8
posted on
12/20/2008 5:38:22 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(--www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com--)
To: Arguendo
“The Wall Street Journal was less than 100 percent supportive of that bailout.”
unfortunately, not that much less than 100%
9
posted on
12/20/2008 5:39:31 PM PST
by
ari-freedom
(Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
To: ari-freedom
Bush isn’t fit to shine her shoes with his forked tongue !
10
posted on
12/20/2008 5:49:35 PM PST
by
sushiman
To: madison10
>>>>>Wall Street Journal has alot of nerve...after Wall Street itself was majorly bailed out, no questions asked.
You are exactly right.
11
posted on
12/20/2008 6:38:41 PM PST
by
Thorin
("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson