Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign

Because if he commented on what Romney actually said then he might have to admit that the Republican Party screwed up really big by not nominating someone who was actually QUALIFIED to be President. News flash, we don’t live in England, the President is not supposed to just be a pretty figure head who gets people going at the rallies because he looks good. That’s what socialist England is about, it’s not what we are about.


206 posted on 12/21/2008 8:51:01 AM PST by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rodeo-mamma
So rodeo-mamma, why don't you comment on what Romney actually said in this piece? Could it be because what Romney actually said is contradictory to limited government, conservative principle?

Romney thinks proper government "guidance" ala his MBA management/executive "business" techniques are solutions, and you fall for it. A lot of us here see it for what it really is, and we're doing what we can to stop it NOW so we can get real conservatism in place. Romney is a danger to the Republican party future and to personal American freedom. I think one of the first things conservatives/Republicans must do is to soundly REJECT pretty-sounding, slick-tongued phony moderate liberals like Romney. You are all for hanging on to him, and that means you are opposed to limited government principle. You ought to rethink your political party affiliation, as should Romney.

209 posted on 12/21/2008 9:16:03 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson