Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tanniker Smith; NormsRevenge
So the constitution as amended is unconstitutional??

The legal theory is that Proposition 8 was a rewriting of the CA constitution, rather than amending it, and the process of rewriting is different.

At this point, the legal scholaship keeps saying that it was not a rewriting because it describes and explains the existing constitution as to the meaning of marriage. Jeffrey Toobin of CNN, for example, -- not known for conservatism -- said it is a very long shot to stop Prop 8 with this. But I don't trust them: it could be that they are trying to prevent the religious right from mounting opposition early.

Crooks, all.

87 posted on 12/20/2008 12:21:23 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
The legal theory is that Proposition 8 was a rewriting of the CA constitution, rather than amending it, and the process of rewriting is different.

Actually, Brown conceded that Prop 8 was an amendment rather than a revision. He is advancing a far more dangerous argument. He is actually suggesting that certain things can NEVER be amended.

95 posted on 12/20/2008 5:12:32 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson