There is no embarassment to be had.
Illegitimate birth is not cause for embarassment (except that is contrary to the concept of not eliminating a baby as ‘punishment.’’
Adoption or lineage to an athesit, marxist, black-supremicst, or communist are all terms of endearment to his primary constiuency.
The term “embarassing” is code speak for illegal.
As in forged birthplace, dates, names, and pseudo tales of African romances.
Great comments.
The term “embarassing” is code speak for illegal.
As in forged birthplace, dates, names, and pseudo tales of African romances.
***I wonder if it simply says, “unknown” for name of father. That would prove embarrassing for the obamarxist and add fuel to the fire that he’s not natural born. In essence, it brings to the constitutional fore the issue of burden of proof of eligibility for the president. If it’s an unknown citizen, he’s natural born; if it’s an unknown alien, he’s naturalized. And mama Obama is dead, so the pursuit of the truth is hampered. Of course, we all believe that zer0bama should produce positive proof of eligibility. Our socialist opponents believe he’s eligible because he was elected and choose to ignore the language from the 20th amendment. And he could say that he honestly felt he was eligible all along. What a mess. The supreme court would find some way to punt, I’m sure.
Nothing else makes sense does it? What could possibly be more embarrassing on his BC than Rev. Wright, Father Pfleger, Bill Ayers or his total lack of experience?