Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: olezip

Very slick on the dems’ part. Very slick indeed. How their plan seems to be unfolding:

1. If lose the initial count, get canvassing officials to state they are “tired” and “correct” the totals by 100 in Franken’s favor. Result, Franken gains by 500 votes.

2. After coming up short in the re-canvassing, “find” new ballots strategically placed throughout pro-Franken counties. Pull them up and announce they have been found, and count them in.

3. After double-processing at least 133 votes in (you guessed it) pro-Franken Minneapolis, insist the court allow them counted. Even though the 133 are never found.

4. As insurance, get the court to mandate all the disqualified ballots to be counted, even if erroneous.

5. Finally, when reviewing the challenges, devine the “intent of the voter” and put Franken over the top.

6. Game, set, match.

7. Sen. Elect Al Franken.


79 posted on 12/19/2008 8:03:14 AM PST by ScottinVA (islam IS the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: ScottinVA
Washington State, 1st recount= no change, 2nd recount= slight change, 3rd recount= Dem win by a few votes, recount over. Total votes exceed registered voters, seems right to me.
114 posted on 12/19/2008 8:15:41 AM PST by Foolsgold ("We live in the greatest country in the world and I am going to change it" Barry O'boomarang 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson