Posted on 12/18/2008 3:36:06 PM PST by Hanen
Natural Born Citizen????
Constitutional tests?
Some People Are Too Big To Risk Failing: SCOTUS
"Little people" must continue to pass tests, says court spokesman
You said — “Spread this picture all over the net sometimes pictures are more effective for those who don’t like to read”
It’s also useful for those who don’t have any proof... LOL..
As soon as there is proof that Obama is not qualified under the Constitution, then all these people who say that may take off their tin-foil hats... :-)
We need proof not rumor.
Until he complies with the Constitution he is not my President.
(Leona "Queen of Mean" Helmsley: "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes.")
Proof. Ain't that the point? Where's the birth certificate -- the document we "little people" must show.
Yes, I know that if you have no BC there are other ways but BO has a birth certificate.
You said — “Proof. Ain’t that the point? Where’s the birth certificate — the document we “little people” must show.”
It would seem that Obama has proved all that he is required to prove under the law. There are no state laws requiring the candidate to prove these things which are required under the Constitution. I don’t see a Federal law to that effect either. I only see that the Constitution says that this is how you are to be qualified, but it has left the *enforcement* of those qualifications up to the legislators. The legislators have *no method of enforcement*. Hence, we are in this current position, and Obama does not have to do anything else under the law.
That’s the essence of the problem and why we need to pass state laws to vet these candidates.
At least the people who have been making these buttons and bumper stickers for the last eight years won't go out of business.
Personally I will however continue to express abhorrence of what Rush acknowledged (more or less) the other day when he talked about the Washington of both parties which IMO sees itself as the United States of America.
The rest of us matter on 15 April, every other year on the first Tuesday in November, and when a military is required -- as long as we remain docile that is virtually our lot in Washington's United States of America.
How can you get proof when he has already spent 1 million dollars to keep his records sealed. Don’t you think thats odd would you just throw money away if you had nothing to hide why not just give the paperwork?
You said — “How can you get proof when he has already spent 1 million dollars to keep his records sealed. Don’t you think thats odd would you just throw money away if you had nothing to hide why not just give the paperwork?”
Prosecutors and the FBI have all the resources that they want, at their disposal to find out anything like this. The Bush Administration has say-so over the Justice Department, and *since* Bush is sworn to uphold the Constitution, he would have already found out if the Constitution was being violated. He could easily direct the Justice Department to do whatever investigation that they needed to see if a crime is being committed. Since the Justice Department has not announced an indictment, you can be assured that there is no crime to be prosecuted.
—
But as a side comment, I have seen FReepers indicate that several hundred thousand dollar and up to a million or more has been spent — but — I have found *not one source* that verifies that. It appears to be the “hyperbole” of FReepers and other “Obama-birthers” who make up that figure.
Now, it’s clear that there was a response to Berg’s complaint, but Berg put Obama in there, along with the DNC — so they had to respond. But, as I see it, they tend to stay out of as many court cases as possible.
So, where is the documentation that shows this figure. I have looked for it and I sure can’t find it. So, I think it’s unreliable and a made-up figure.
You said — “Spread this picture all over the net sometimes pictures are more effective for those who don’t like to read”
It’s also useful for those who don’t have any proof... LOL..
As soon as there is proof that Obama is not qualified under the Constitution, then all these people who say that may take off their tin-foil hats... :-)
_____________________________
Go back to Barry- and don’t forget to take your kneepads
.
WE DO HAVE PROOF.
http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/22/obamas_born_conspiracy_forged_images,_phony_photos,_and_felony_fraud.thtml
I know someone who just got the Sotero divorce file. appears Obama was adopted and had a legal name change to Sotero and it was never legally returned to Obama. OOPS
It’s hard to find ironclad proof when 0bama and his team have scrubbed every record of his life from the entire planet, practically speaking. And refuses to provide his long form (aka “real”) birth certificate. McCain, as miserable a candidate as he was, at least showed his.
Star Traveler:
“There’s no controlling legal authority, and anyone who is concerned about it is a loon LOL!”
You said — “There’s no controlling legal authority, and anyone who is concerned about it is a loon LOL!”
There’s nothing to be concerned about as it has been shown that Obama qualifies under the Constitution. And, on the flip side of that, no one has shown any proof that Obama is not qualified.
If someone wants further proof than has already been given, then they wlll have to enact legislation in order to require further levels of proof than what has already been given. That would be why (if someone is “concerned” as you say) that they would work with their state to get that legislation in place before the next election.
“No controlling legal authority....LOL!”
You said — “No controlling legal authority....LOL!”
Well, there is and Obama has met the controlling authority requirement. That’s why he’s able to proceed and become President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.