But it just seems like the study's making a lot of assumptions. Like studying accidents on highways that weren't designed for the traffic and speeds on them. That speeding wouldn't affect reaction time. That everyone knows what constitutes "unavoidable" and "reasonable". Just stuff like that. Seems like there's an awful lot of room for interpretation.
Reasonable would be that OnStar commercial where a driver doesn't want to hit the pretty deer in the road so instead he crashes his vehicle into a tree injuring/killing him and his passengers?