Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
I'm ok with taxing unhealthful activities or products. But they have to have the science right, and too often it's based on junk science.

How is it consistent with a free society for the government to make people live a certain approved lifestyle?

121 posted on 12/17/2008 9:55:10 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback

I am at the point that I don’t care who likes my lifestyle or not. I really resent being taxed for it too. I wonder what tax is coming next...


122 posted on 12/17/2008 10:40:17 PM PST by pandoraou812 (Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn! ...........^............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback
"How is it consistent with a free society for the government to make people live a certain approved lifestyle?"

Taxation doesn't force, it merely encourages.

As long as people can become wards of the state by becoming indigent, disabled, ophaned, etc., as long as disease can be spread to innocents or epidemics started by unhealthy people, then Government has a significant legitimate interest in promoting good health practices.

You might as well ask how is it consistent with a free state for the government to insist your chinese food preparers wash their hands and don't add melamine to your food. Or for government to deny pushers access to highly addictive drugs. Or to limit the speed you can travel down public roads.

It's the same thing, it is just where you choose to draw the line. It's always going to be a balancing act.

161 posted on 12/19/2008 10:26:23 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson