Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. judge jails Muslim woman over head scarf
msnbc ^ | Decemebr 17, 2008 | The Associated Press

Posted on 12/17/2008 11:40:19 AM PST by Melissa 24

DOUGLASVILLE, Ga. - A judge ordered a Muslim woman arrested Tuesday for contempt of court for refusing to take off her head scarf at a security checkpoint. The judge ordered Lisa Valentine, 40, to serve 10 days in jail, said police in Douglasville, a city of about 20,000 people on Atlanta's west suburban outskirts. Valentine violated a court policy that prohibits people from wearing any headgear in court, police said. The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations urged federal authorities to investigate the incident as well as others in Georgia. "I just felt stripped of my civil, my human rights," Valentine told The Associated Press on Wednesday from her home, after she said she was unexpectedly released once CAIR got involved. Jail officials declined to say why she was freed. No comment from judge Municipal Court Judge Keith Rollins said that "it would not be appropriate" for him to comment on the case. Last year, a judge in Valdosta in southern Georgia barred a Muslim woman from entering a courtroom because she would not remove her head scarf. There have been similar cases in other states, including Michigan, where a Muslim woman in Detroit filed a federal lawsuit in February 2007 after a judge dismissed her small-claims court case when she refused to remove a head and face veil. Valentine's husband, Omar Hall, said his wife was accompanying her nephew to a traffic citation hearing when officials stopped her at the metal detector and told her she would not be allowed in the courtroom with the head scarf, known as a hijab.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: cair; hajib; headscarf; mohammedanism; mohammedanism122008; muslim; muslimwomen; news; ruling; security
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2008 11:40:20 AM PST by Melissa 24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

I can see banning veils that obscure the face (especially for a witness or defendant). But a headscarf that leaves the face exposed seems innocuous enough in a court room. I know my grandmother would never go to church without a scarf to cover her head.


2 posted on 12/17/2008 11:43:08 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24
What's the big deal?

In a couple of years that's how all women in America will be required to dress. It's not like she was wearing a crucifix or anything.

3 posted on 12/17/2008 11:44:00 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

She can kiss my a$$, as long as she does it through a piece of Saran Wrap...


4 posted on 12/17/2008 11:44:51 AM PST by babygene (It seems that stupidity is the most abundant element in the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

But I bet she’d go to court in Georgia without a scarf to cover her head if she was told the court’s rules prohibited head coverings, wouldn’t she?


5 posted on 12/17/2008 11:45:00 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

When she starts talking about her civil rights being stripped she’s talking American Law. You can’t talk American Law out one side of her burka and not obey out of the other.


6 posted on 12/17/2008 11:45:03 AM PST by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

Keep it up. Enforce it to the letter. Maybe they will leave. Or maybe they will get violent and we can start shooting in self defense. Either way it works out.


7 posted on 12/17/2008 11:46:02 AM PST by AbeKrieger (Clomppity clomp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Now THAT’S good sarcsasm!


8 posted on 12/17/2008 11:46:15 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

This judge has balls. This is precisely what we need as we face Islamofacism.


9 posted on 12/17/2008 11:46:27 AM PST by TheThinker (Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Good point.


10 posted on 12/17/2008 11:46:44 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

"Valentine’s husband, Omar Hall, said she was accompanying her nephew to address a traffic citation Tuesday when she was stopped at the metal detector and told she would not be allowed to enter the courtroom with a head scarf."

"Hall said Valentine, an insurance underwriter, told the bailiff that she had been in courtrooms before with a scarf on; that removing it would be a religious violation. She became frustrated, then turned to leave and uttered an expletive, Hall said."

11 posted on 12/17/2008 11:47:04 AM PST by Mojave (http://barackobamajokes.googlepages.com/obama_funny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

“U.S. judge jails Muslim woman over head scarf”

With any luck, she’ll grow dispondent in jail and hang herself with that head scarf wrapped around her neck...one less muzzie in America.


12 posted on 12/17/2008 11:47:38 AM PST by Towed_Jumper (Stephen Hopkins: Founding Father who had Cerebral Palsy.."My hand trembles, my heart does not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
But I bet she’d go to court in Georgia without a scarf to cover her head if she was told the court’s rules prohibited head coverings, wouldn’t she?

Sure. But the scarf was not a religious requirement for her outside of church. For some religions, head coverings are required- some Jews wear yarmulkes, Sikhs wear turbans, for example. Unless the head covering interferes with the functions of the court, I don't see any legitimate reason to ban it.

13 posted on 12/17/2008 11:47:49 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

“Stripped of her human rights”. eh? Has she been circumcised?


14 posted on 12/17/2008 11:47:58 AM PST by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

I can see where a strict Jew would wear his skull cap.
Seems reasonable to me. So some lady within the confines of her religion isn’t supposed to be in public without her head covered? Sounds equally reasonable.
Jail time?
We have some REAL criminals out there boys.


15 posted on 12/17/2008 11:48:44 AM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
She became frustrated, then turned to leave and uttered an expletive

Not surprising at all. Religion as excuse. Only to be practiced when it's time to get payed, mmm hmm. Oh no he didn't.

16 posted on 12/17/2008 11:48:47 AM PST by AbeKrieger (Clomppity clomp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24
LOL! The first time I saw the headline I thought it said

"U.S. Judge Nails Muslim Woman Over Head Scarf"

.
17 posted on 12/17/2008 11:50:10 AM PST by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

Church is one thing, and I’d have a problem if a court said something about what she could wear in church. Court is another thing entirely . If it’s against the rule in court either don’t go or don’t wear something that is sure to get you trouble. There is a good reason for banning headgear of any kind in a court....hidden weapons comes to mind.


18 posted on 12/17/2008 11:51:59 AM PST by pepperdog (The world has gone crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Melissa 24

In the original story, I thought she was actually jailed for contempt of court after uttering an expletive.


19 posted on 12/17/2008 11:52:11 AM PST by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
We have some REAL criminals out there boys.

The more rules we create, the more criminals we have. This judge seems to have a chip on his shoulder. What's the point of making a religiously observant person take off their head covering if it is not interfering with court business? A Hasidic Jew, for example, might well be more willing to take a secular punishment for failing to appear in court, rather than commit a sin.

20 posted on 12/17/2008 11:53:07 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson